Evolution of the number of authors in publications within the Spanish academic field from 1990 to 2022

Main Article Content

Joaquín León-Marín
Mar Sáenz-López

Abstract

The evolution of scientific collaboration is analyzed based on a highly representative sample of Spanish researchers from all areas of knowledge and the publications in which they have participated. The study examines the number of authors listed in the published works between the years 1990 and 2022. Two types of results are offered: presenting the evolution in the number of authors participating in publications across twenty-five thematic disciplines and providing a percentage comparison of the evolution of co-authorships in five major thematic areas. Finally, options for possible future studies in this field are presented.

Article Details


References

Abramo, G., & D’Angelo, C. A. (2015). The relationship between the number of authors of a publication, its citations and the impact factor of the publishing journal: Evidence from Italy. Journal of Informetrics, 9(4), 746–761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.07.003

Barabási, A. L., Jeong, H., Néda, Z., Ravasz, E., Schubert, A., & Vicsek, T. (2002). Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 311(3–4), 590–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4371(02)00736-7

Beaver, D. B., & Rosen, R. (1978). Studies in scientific collaboration - Part I. The professional origins of scientific co-authorship. Scientometrics, 1(1), 65–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016840

Beaver, D. B., & Rosen, R. (1979). Studies in scientific collaboration - Part II. Scientific co-authorship, research productivity and visibility in the French scientific elite, 1799-1830. Scientometrics, 1(2), 133–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016966

Bukvova, H. (2010). Studying research collaboration: A Literature Review. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems, 10(January 2010).

Cai, X., Fry, C. V, & Wagner, C. S. (2021). International collaboration during the Covid-19 crisis: autumn 2020 developments. Scientometrics, 126(4), 3683–3692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03873-7

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

Delgado López-Cozar, E., & Martín Martín, A. (2024). La ruta de oro de la publicación científica: del negocio de las revistas a las revistas negocio. La fuente del negocio editorial: el negocio bibliométrico de la evaluación científica. Revista Mediterránea de Comunicación, 15(2), 393–438. https://doi.org/10.14198/MEDCOM.26763

Didegah, F., & Thelwall, M. (2013). Which factors help authors produce the highest impact research? Collaboration, journal and document properties. Journal of Informetrics, 7(4), 861–873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2013.08.006

Franceschet, M., & Costantini, A. (2010). The effect of scholar collaboration on impact and quality of academic papers. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 540–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.06.003

Gazni, A., Sugimoto, C. R., & Didegah, F. (2012). Mapping world scientific collaboration: Authors, institutions, and countries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(2), 323–335. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21688

González-Alcaide, G., & Gómez-Ferri, J. (2014). La colaboración científica: principales líneas de investigación y retos de futuro. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 37(4). https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2014.4.1186

González-Alcaide, G., Gómez-Ferri, J., Agulló-Calatayud, V. (2013). La colaboración científica como objeto de estudio. In G. González-Alcaide, J. Gómez-Ferri & V. Agulló-Calatayud (Dirs). La colaboración científica: una aproximación multidisciplinar (pp. 13–15). Valencia: Nau Llibres. https://naullibres.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/9788476429303_L33_23.pdf

Isfandyari-Moghaddam, A., Saberi, M. K., Tahmasebi-Limoni, S., Mohammadian, S., & Naderbeigi, F. (2023). Global scientific collaboration: A social network analysis and data mining of the co-authorship networks. Journal of Information Science, 49(4), 1126–1141. https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515211040655

Jassawalla, A. R., & Sashittal, H. C. (1998). An examination of collaboration in high-technology new product development processes. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15(3), 237–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1530237

Lancho-Barrantes, B. S., Guerrero Bote, V. P., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., & De-Moya-Anegón, F. (2012). Citation flows in the zones of influence of scientific collaborations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(3), 481–489. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21682

Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 673–702. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312705052359

López-Borrull, A., Canals-Parera, A. (2013). La colaboración científica en el marco de nuevas propuestas científicas: Open Science,e-Science y Big Data. In G. González-Alcaide, J. Gómez-Ferri & V. Agulló-Calatayud (Dirs). La colaboración científica: una aproximación multidisciplinar (pp. 91–100). Valencia: Nau Llibres.

Marcos-Cartagena, D., Ruiz-Pérez, R., Delgado-López-Cozar, E. (2013). La producción bibliográfica sobre autoría científica. In G. González-Alcaide, J. Gómez-Ferri & V. Agulló-Calatayud (Dirs). La colaboración científica: una aproximación multidisciplinar (pp. 39–68). Valencia: Nau Llibres.

Newman, M. E. J. (2001). The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98(2), 404–409. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.98.2.404

Perianes-Rodríguez, A., Olmeda-Gómez, C., & De-Moya-Anegón, F. (2010). Redes de colaboración científica: análisis y visualización de patrones de coautoría. Tirant lo Blanch.

Persson, O., Glänzel, W., & Danell, R. (2004). Inflationary bibliometric values: The role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies. Scientometrics, 60(3), 421–432. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000034384.35498.7d

Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2019). Diffusion of innovations. In D. W. Stacks, M. B. Salwen, & K. C. Eichhorn (Eds.). An Integrated Approach to Communication Theory and Research, Third Edition (pp. 415–433). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203710753-35

Sheng, J., Liang, B., Wang, L., & Wang, X. (2023). Evolution of scientific collaboration based on academic ages. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2023.128846

Sonnenwald, D. H. (2007). Scientific collaboration. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41, 643–681. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.2007.1440410121

Thelwall, M., & Maflahi, N. (2022). Research coauthorship 1900–2020: Continuous, universal, and ongoing expansion. Quantitative Science Studies, 3(2), 331–344. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00188

Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036–1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099