Articles
Thinking about the Exceptions. Violence, Equality and Dignity from Kant
Published 2017-11-11
How to Cite
Lazos, E. (2017). Thinking about the Exceptions. Violence, Equality and Dignity from Kant. Tópicos, Revista De Filosofía, (54), 117–146. https://doi.org/10.21555/top.v0i54.875
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Altmetrics
Citas
Abstract
This essay undertakes a critical interrogation of the notion of moral exception from a certain understanding of Kant´s categorical morality. The overall goals are systematic, rather that exegetical. The general objective is to think the notions of moral exceptionality and violence, together with those of equality and dignity. The essay makes a series of mutually related claims: that moral violence is a break or rupture of moral equality; that equality is part of an action´s conditions of assent; that, in the absence of conditions of assent, the bindingness of moral duties dissapears. Exceptions may be understood, accordingly, as a product of a local rupture of conditions of assent, without thereby discrediting morality as a whole. On the contrary, when properly understood, exceptions are done within morality, and for morality´s sake. Furthermore, the essay suggests a notion of Kantian dignity —understood as a limit concept, rather than as the concept of an intrinsic value of agents—which is not only compatible but also supplements the proposed notion of moral equality.References
- Bábic, J. (2000). Die Pflicht, nicht zu lügen –eine volkommende, jedoch nicht auch juridische Pflicht. Kant-Studien, 91, 433-446.
- Constant, B. (1797/1988). Des réactions politiques. Paris: Flammarion.
- Gordon, R. (2011). Mainstreaming Terrorism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Hill, T. (1992). Making Exceptions Without Abandonding Principles. En R. G. Frey & Ch. W. Morris. (eds.) Violence, Terrorism and Justice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Fourie, C., Schuppert, F. & Wallimann-Helmer, I. (2015). Social Equality: On What It Means To Be Equals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Kant, I. (1797a). Die Metaphysik der Sitten (1797), AA 6: 205-492. [La metafísica de las costumbres. A. Cortina y J. Conill. (trads.) Madrid: Tecnos, 1989.]
- _____ (1797b). Über ein vermeintes Recht aus Menschenliebe zu lügen. [Sobre un presunto derecho a mentir por razones de filantropía. En (1986). Immanuel Kant: Teoría y Práctica. J. M. Palacios, et al. (trads.) Madrid: Tecnos.]
- _____ (1794). Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der blossen Vernunft. AA 6:1-195. (1785). Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. AA 4: 387-463. [Kant, I. (1996). Fundamentación de la metafísica de las costumbres. J. Mardomingo. (trad.) Barcelona: Ariel.]
- Korsgaard, Ch. (1986). The Right to Lie: Kant on dealing with Evil. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 15/4, 325-349.
- Lazos, E. (2016). Presentación: Kant y la violencia. En Contextos Kantianos, 3, 253-255. (2014). Reflexiones sobre el terrorismo contemporáneo. En Normatividad, democracia y violencia. L. E. Hoyos. (ed.) Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
- _____ (2010). Devils with Understanding: Two Tensions in Kant´s Practical Philosophy. En Rethinking Kant. Vol. II. P. Muchnik. (ed.) Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Publishers.
- Menzer, P. (ed.) (1924). Eine Vorlesung Kants über Ethik. Berlin: Pan Verlag.
- Paton, H. (1954). An Alleged Right to Lie. A Problem in Kantian Ethics. Kant-Studien, 45/1-4, 190-203.
- Pippin, R. (2001). Rigorism and the ‘New Kant’. En Kant un die berliner Aufklärung. Akten des IX Internationalen Kant-Kongresses. Gerhardt, V. et. al. (hrsg.) Band I, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
- Primoratz, I. (2013). Terrorism: A Philosophical Investigation. Oxford: Polity.
- Rivera Castro, F. (2014). Virtud, felicidad y religión en la filosofía moral de Kant. México: UNAM.
- Sensen, O. (2009). Kant´s Conception of Human Dignity. En Kant-Studien 100, 309-331.
- Schneewind, J. (1998). The Invention of Autonomy. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.