Articles
Published 2013-11-28
How to Cite
Sienra, A. G. de la. (2013). La crisis del humanismo secular y la alternativa pluralista. Tópicos, Revista De Filosofía, 19(1), 117–122. https://doi.org/10.21555/top.v19i1.337
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Altmetrics
Citas
Abstract
Secular Humanism (SH) has been unable to provide an adequate foundation for public ethics and has been destructive of those faith communities on which it depends for its very existence. Thus, what is required is a new political system, based on religious freedom and a dialogue which includes all these communities (including SH), that prevents such destruction and is able to provide a convincing public ethics.
References
- Dooyeweerd, H. (1984). A New Critique of Theoretical Thought. Jordan Station: Paideia.
- Habermas, J. (1987). Teoría de la acción comunicativa. Vols. 2. Madrid: Taurus.
- Hegel, G. W. F. (1967). Philosophy of Right. En Hegel’s Philosophy of Right. T. M. Knox (comp.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Hume, D. (1948). A Treatise of Human Nature. En Hume’s Moral and Political Philosophy. H. Aiken (comp.) Nueva York: Haiffen Press.
- Plantinga, A. (2000). The onus Probandi of Theism. En The Rationality of Theism. A. García de la Sienra (comp.) Amsterdam: Rodopi.
- Rawls, J. (1995). Liberalismo político. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
- Searle, J. R. (1985). Cómo derivar ‘debe’ de ‘es’. En Ética y análisis I. e. Rabossi y F. Salmerón (comps.) (225-242). México: UNAM.
- Swinburne, R. (2000). Cosmological and Teleological Arguments. En The Rationality of Theism. A. García de la Sienra (comp.) Amsterdam: Rodopi.
- Wolterstorff, N. (2000).De liberal a plural. Xalapa: Documento de Trabajo de la Facultad de Economía.