Published 2013-11-28
How to Cite
Salles, R. (2013). El argos logos y su refutación por Crisipo. Tópicos, Revista De Filosofía, 28(1), 239–254. https://doi.org/10.21555/top.v28i1.234
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Altmetrics
Citas
Abstract
, , , , , ,References
- Alejandro de Afrodisia. (1983). On Fate. Londres.
- Anscombe, G. E. M. (1956). Aristotle and the Sea-Battle. En Problems of Space and Time. J. Smart (ed.) (43-57). Nueva York.
- Aristóteles. (1894). Ethica Nicomachea. I. Bywater (ed.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- ____ (1949). Categoriae et liber de interpretatione. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Bobzien, S. (1998). Determinism and Freedom in Stoic Philosophy. Oxford.
- Cicerón. (1965). De divinatione, De fato et Timaeus. W. Ax (ed.) Stuttgart.
- Eusebio. (1954-1956). Preparatio evangelica. K. Mras (ed.) Berlín.
- Long, A., Sedley, D. (1987). TheHellenistic Philosophers. Vols. 2. Cambridge.
- Lowe, M. (1980). Aristotle on the sea battle: a clarification. En Analysis, 40: 55-59.
- Orígenes. (1967-1976). Contra Celsum. M. Borret (ed.) París.
- Plutarco. (1952). De Stoicorum repugnantiis. Leipzig.
- Poliakoff, M. (1987). Combat Sports in the Ancient World Competition, Violence, and Culture. New Haven and London.
- Reesor, M. (1978). Necessity and fate in Stoic philosophy. En The Stoics. J. Rist (ed.) Berkeley, Los Ángeles, Londres.
- Rist, J. (1969). Stoic Philosophy. Cambridge.
- Sedley, D. (1993). Chrysippus on psycholophysical causation. En Passions and Perception. J. Brunschwig and M. Nussbaum (eds.) Cambridge.
- Sorabji, R. (1974). Aristotle on the role of intellect in virtue. En Essays on Aristotle’s Ethics. A. O. Rorty (ed.) Berkeley, Los Ángeles y Londres.
- ____ (1980). Necessity, Cause, and Blame. Perspectives on Aristotle’s Theory. Londres.
- Von Arnim, H. (1903-1905). Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta. Vols. 4. Leipzig.
- Wiggins, D. (1975). Deliberation and practical reason. En Essays on Aristotle’s Ethics. A. O. Rorty (ed.) Berkeley, Los Ángeles y Londres.
- Williams, C. (1980). What is, necessarily is, when it is. En Analysis, 40: 127-131.