Número 33 - 2007
Articles

Zenón de Elea y Compañía

María Teresa Padilla Longoria
Bar Ilan University

Published 2013-11-28

How to Cite

Longoria, M. T. P. (2013). Zenón de Elea y Compañía. Tópicos, Revista De Filosofía, 33(1), 119–140. https://doi.org/10.21555/top.v33i1.162

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Altmetrics

Citas

Abstract

In this article we have the aim of confronting Plato’s and Aristotle’s ideas on dialectic and other associated practices resourcing to the judgments that both philosophers made in that respect and the position that they showed before such practices achieved by Zeno of Elea and two archetypical sophists like Protagoras and Gorgias. All of this with the aim of emphasising, first, the risk that for Plato entailed the generalisation of such practices and the contrast that implied in relation with his philosophical project of dialogic examination and unselfish search for the truth and, second, with the aim of showing the way that Aristotle intended to open with the position that he had in relation with Zeno and the sophists and that led him to develop other ideas on dialectic itself, rhetoric and sophistic.

 

References

  1. Aristóteles. Metaphysics. J. H. M’Mahon (trad.) London: R. Clay.
  2. ____ (1958). Metaphysics: Books A-E. Vol. 1. W. D. Ross (ed.) Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  3. ____ (1971). Metaphysics Books Γ, Δ and Ε. C. Kirwan (trad.) Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  4. ____ (1990). Metaphysics X-XIV. H. Tredennick y G. C. Armstrong (trads.) Harvard: Loeb Classical Library.
  5. ____ (1992). On Sophistical Refutations. E. S. Forster y D. J. Furley (trads.) Cambridge, MA y London: Harvard University Press.
  6. ____ (1994). Art of Rhetoric. J. H. Freese (trad.) Cambridge, MA, y London: Harvard University Press.
  7. ____ (1996). Topics Books I and VIII. R. Smith (trad.) Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  8. ____ (1997). Posterior Analytics/Topica. H. Tredennick y S. Forster (trads.) London: Harvard University Press.
  9. Aubenque, P. (1984). El problema del ser en Aristóteles. V. Peña (trad.) Madrid: Taurus.
  10. Balaudé, J. F. (1996). La philosophie comme mise à l’épreuve. Le mutatioins de l’elenchos de Socrate à Platon. En Platon et l’objet de la science. P. M. Morel (comp.) Presses Universitaires de Bordeaux.
  11. Baltzly, D. (1999). Aristotle and Platonic dialectic in Metaphysics Γ 4. En Apeiron, 32: 171-202.
  12. Beversluis, J. (2000). Cross-Examining Socrates. A defense of the interlocutors in Plato’s early dialogues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  13. Blachowicz, J. (1998). Of Two Minds: the nature of inquiry. Albano y New Cork: Suny Press.
  14. Brunschwig, J. (1996). Aristotle’s rhetoric as a ‘counterpart to dialectic’. En Essays on Aristotle’s Rhetoric. A. O. Rorty (ed.) (34-55). University of California Press.
  15. Burnyeat, M. F. (1976). Protagoras and self-refutation in Plato’s Theaetetus. En Philosophical Review, 85: 172-195.
  16. Caveing, M. (2002). Zenon et le continu. París: Vrin.
  17. Colli, G. (1983). El nacimiento de la filosofía. C. Manzano (trad.) Barcelona: Tusquets.
  18. Diels, H., Kranz, W. (1996). Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. Band I und Band II. Zürich: Weidemann.
  19. Diogenes Laertius. (1995). Lives of Eminent Philosophers. Vols. 2. R. D. Hicks (trad.) London: Harvard University Press.
  20. Evans, J. D. G. (1977). Aristotle’s Concept of Dialectic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  21. Furley, D. J. (1993). Zeno and indivisible magnitudes. En The Presocratics. A. P. D. Mourelatos (ed.) Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  22. Gadamer, H. G. (1991). Die sokratische Frage und Aristoteles. En Gesamelte Werke 7. Griechische Philosophique III. Plato im Dialog. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
  23. Gonzalez, F. J. (1998). Dialectic and Dialogue: Plato’s practice of philosophical inquiry. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
  24. Gorgias. (1980). Fragmentos. P. C. Tapia (trad.) México: UNAM y BSGRM.
  25. Hintikka, J. (1959). Aristotle and the ambiguity of ambiguity. En Inquiry, 2: 137-151.
  26. ____ (1974). Knowledge and the Known. Historical perspectives in epistemology. Dordrecht y Boston: D. Reidel.
  27. Irwin, T. H. (1988). Aristotle’s First Principles. Clarendon Press.
  28. ____ (1995). Plato’s objections to the Sophist. En The Greek World. A. Powell (ed.) (568-590). Londres y Nueva York: Routledge.
  29. Kahn, C. (1996). Plato and the Socratic Dialogue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  30. Kerferd, G. B. (1993). The Sophistic Movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  31. Kirdk, G. S., Raven, J. E., Schofield, M. (1993). The Presocratic Philosophers. 2da ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  32. Lloyd, G. E. R. (1993). Magic, Reason and Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  33. Nehamas, A. (1990). Eristic, antilogic, sophistic, dialectic: Plato’s demarcation of philosophy from sophistry. En History of Philosophy Quarterly, 7: 3-16.
  34. Nicol, E. (1974). Metafísica de la expression. Nueva versión. México: FCE.
  35. Platón. (1988a). Opera. Vol. 1. E. Duke, W. F. Hicken, W. S. Nicoll, D. B. Robinson y J. C. G. Strachan (eds.) Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  36. ____ (1988b). Opera. Vol. 2. I. Burnet (ed.) Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  37. ____ (1988c). Opera. Vol. 3. I. Burnet (ed.) Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  38. ____ (1988d). Opera. Vol. 4. I. Burnet (ed.) Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  39. ____ (1988e). Opera. Vol. 5. I. Burnet (ed.) Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  40. Robinson, R. (1962). Plato’s Earlier Dialectic. 2da ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  41. Rowe, C. J. (1989). The Unity of the Phaedrus: a reply to Heath. En Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 7: 176-188.
  42. ____ (1992). Parasite or fantasist? The role of the literary commentator. En Cogito: 9-18.
  43. Ryle, G. (1966). Plato’s Progress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  44. Sichirolo, L. (1966). Διαλέγεσθαι-Dialektik. Von Homer bis Aristoteles. Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlagbuchhandlung.
  45. Striker, G. (1996). Methods of sophistry. En Essays on Hellenistic Epistemology and Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  46. Wilson Nightingale, A. (1995). Genres in Dialogue. Plato and the construct of philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  47. Xenophon. (1979). Memorabilia, Oeconomicus, Symposium, Apology. E. C. Marchant y O. J. Todd (eds.) Harvard: Harvard University Press.