Número 34 - 2008
Articles

Instrumenta sciendi

Walter Redmond
Universidad Panamericana

Published 2013-11-28

How to Cite

Redmond, W. (2013). Instrumenta sciendi. Tópicos, Revista De Filosofía, 34(1), 105–139. https://doi.org/10.21555/top.v34i1.150

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Altmetrics

Citas

Abstract

In his Logica mexicana , Antonio Rubio, S.J., developed a theory of science using the notion of instrument to analyize how logic is related to the sciences. Aristotle’s logical works were called the “instrument” ( organon ) of philosophy, and for Rubio, logic provides the “instruments of knowing” ( instrumenta sciendi ) for the sciences (and for itself). This expression goes back to Aristotle’s “method of knowing”, which must be acquired before the science itself. Rubio interpreted these instruments as the technique of defining and classifying the items of scientific study, forming statements about them, and organizing these statements into a system. He also gave an explanation of the ontological nature of the instruments. I shall describe Rubio’s partially original scientific hermeneutic from the viewpoint of current philosophy and logic.

 

References

  1. Falcón de Gyves, C. (1945). El Padre Antonio Rubio, S. J. (1548-1615)/ Sus comentarios a los libros De anima de Aristóteles. En Ábside, 9 (1): 3-102.
  2. Fitch, F. B. (1952). Symbolic Logic. Nueva York: The Ronald Press Company.
  3. Henares, D. (1984). La lógica mexicana del rodense Antonio Rubio. En Al-Basit, revista de Estudios albacetenses: 5-42.
  4. Hintikka, J. (1962). Knowledge and Belief. An Introduction to the Logic of the Two Notions. Cornell: University Press.
  5. Osorio, I. O. (1988). Antonio Rubio en la Filosofía Novohispana. México: UNAM.
  6. Quiles, I. (1951). Ubicación de la filosofía del Padre Antonio Rubio dentro de la historia de la escolástica. En Ciencia y fe: 7-46.
  7. Redmond, W. (1972). Bibliography of the Philosophy in the Iberian Colonies in America. Nijhoff: La Haya.
  8. ____ (1979). Logic in New Spain. En The Review of Metaphysics.
  9. ____ (1982). La Lógica Mexicana de Antonio Rubio: una nota histórica. En Diánoia, 28: 309-330.
  10. ____ (1984). Lógica y ciencia en la Lógica mexicana de Rubio. En Quipu/Revista latinoamericana de historia de las ciencias y la tecnología, 1 (1).
  11. ____ (1993). Logik, Wissenschaft und Literatur [in Antonius Rubius]. En Concordia, 24: 24- 33.
  12. ____ (1998). Philosophy versus Concern for Indians/ A Jesuit’s Internal Struggle. En The Modern Schoolman, 75: 320-336.
  13. ____ (2000). Colonial Thought in Latin America. En Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Vol. 5.
  14. ____ (2002a). Ser y poder en la Metafísica de José de Aguilar. En Ideas y Valores, 119: 19-34.
  15. ____ (2002b). Rubio: Filosofía de la lógica/ Variantes de la Lógica Mexicana. En Relaciones, 91 (23).
  16. ____ (2002c). La lógica del Siglo de Oro/Una introducción histórica a la lógica. Pamplona: EUNSA.
  17. Risse, W. (1970). Die Logik der Neuzeit. Stuttgart: Bad Cannstadt.
  18. Rudner, R. S. (1965). An Introduction to Simplicity. En Philosophical Problems of Natural Sciences. D. Shapere (ed.) Londres: MacMillan.