Núm. 60 (2021): Enero - junio
Filosofía en el espacio público

Más allá de la aplicación. El caso de la ética ambiental

PDF XML
  • Luca Valera,
  • Gabriel Vidal,
  • Yuliana Leal
Luca Valera
Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Santiago de Chile
Biografía
Gabriel Vidal
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
Biografía
Yuliana Leal
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
Biografía
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21555/top.v0i60.1122

Publicado 2020-10-27

Palabras clave

Cómo citar

Valera, L., Vidal, G., & Leal, Y. (2020). Más allá de la aplicación. El caso de la ética ambiental. Tópicos, Revista De Filosofía, (60), 437–460. https://doi.org/10.21555/top.v0i60.1122
Aviso de derechos de autor/a

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Altmetrics

Citas

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Resumen

La ética ambiental es usualmente vista como una rama de la ética aplicada cuya tarea es ofrecer soluciones a los dilemas éticos emergentes en el contexto de la ecología. En este artículo cuestionamos esta suposición mostrando cómo el objeto de la ética ambiental suscita preguntas y cuestiones que van más allá de las consideraciones de la ética aplicada. Exploramos cómo las cuestiones ambientales reanudan la necesidad de preguntarse por el estatuto ontológico de la Naturaleza y el lugar de los seres humanos en ella, suscitando así preguntas más generales y de amplio alcance que no quedan atrapadas en la mera aplicación. Respecto a esto, el sentido ontológico del “habitar” aparece en el fondo de estas preguntas, estableciendo un puente entre lo ontológico y lo práctico. Finalmente, revisamos los paradigmas clásicos de la ética ambiental, destacando aquellos elementos que van más allá de las éticas aplicadas. Así, considerando los diferentes paradigmas éticos ambientales, tenemos dos opciones: reducir el alcance de la disciplina y excluir los modelos que la exceden, o bien, reconsiderar la disciplina como una filosofía ambiental tout court.

PDF XML

Citas

  1. Anderberg, S. (1998). Industrial Metabolism and the Linkages Between Economics, Ethics and the Environment. Ecological Economics, 24(2-3), 311-320.
  2. Attfield, R. (2018). Environmental Ethics: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
  3. Barry, B. E. & Ohland, M. W. (2009). Applied Ethics in the Engineering, Health, Business, and Law Professions: A Comparison. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(4), 377-388.
  4. Beauchamp, T. (2007). History and Theory in Applied Ethics. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 17(1), 55-64.
  5. Bookchin, M. (1971). Post-Scarcity Anarchism. Wildwood.
  6. Bordeau, P. (2004). The Man Nature Relationship and Environmental Ethics. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 72, 9-15.
  7. Bosk, C. (1999). Professional Ethicist Available: Logical, Secular, Friendly. Daedalus, 128(4), 47-68.
  8. Brand, R. & Fisher, I. (2013). Overcoming the Technophilia/Technophobia Split in Environmental Discourse. Environmental Politics, 22(2), 235-254.
  9. Cafaro, P. & Sandler, R. (2005). Environmental Virtue Ethics. Rowman & Littlefield.
  10. Callicott, J. B. (1984). Non-Anthropocentric Value Theory and Environmental Ethics. American Philosophical Quarterly, 21(4), 299-309.
  11. Callicott, J. B. (1985). Intrinsic Value, Quantum Theory, and Environmental Ethics. Environmental Ethics, 7(3), 257-275.
  12. Carson, R. (1962). Silent Spring. Houghton Mifflin.
  13. Cassirer, E. (1953). An Essay on Man. An Introduction to a Philosophy of Human Culture. Doubleday.
  14. Cortina, A. (1996). El Estatuto de la Ética Aplicada. Hermenéutica Crítica de Las Actividades Humanas. Isegoría. Revista de filosofía moral y política, 13, 119-127.
  15. Cortina, A. (2007). Ética aplicada y democracia radical. Tecnos.
  16. d’Eaubonne, F. (1974). Le féminisme ou la mort. P. Horay.
  17. Dewey, J. (1958). Experience and Nature. Dover Publications.
  18. Eliade, M. (1976). Occultism, Witchcraft, and Cultural Fashions: Essays in Comparative Religion. University of Chicago Press.
  19. Embree, L. (2012). The Possibility of Constitutive Phenomenology of the Environment. In T. Toadvine & C. S. Brown (eds.), Eco-Phenomenology: Back to the Earth Itself. (pp. 37-50). State University of New York Press.
  20. Ezra, O. (2006). Moral Dilemmas in Real Life. Current Issues in Applied Ethics. Springer.
  21. Gadamer, H.-G. (2013). Truth and Method. Bloomsbury.
  22. Gehlen, A. (1988). Man: His Nature and Place in the World. Columbia University Press.
  23. Gillroy, J. M. (1998). Kantian Ethics and Environmental Policy Argument: Autonomy, Ecosystem Integrity, and Our Duties to Nature. Ethics and the Environment, 3(2), 131-155.
  24. Gillroy, J. M. (2001). Justice and Nature: Kantian Philosophy, Environmental Policy and the Law. Georgetown University Press.
  25. Glasser, H. & Drengson A. (2005). The Selected Works of Arne Næss, Springer.
  26. Habermas, J. (2001). Die Zukunft der menschlichen Natur. Auf dem Weg zu einer liberalen Eugenik? Suhrkamp.
  27. Harrison, P. (2007). The Space between Us: Opening Remarks on the Concept of Dwelling. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 25(4), 625-647.
  28. Hedgecoe, A. (2004). Critical Bioethics: Beyond the Social Science Critique of Applied Ethics. Bioethics, 18(2), 120-143.
  29. Heidegger, M. (1971a). Building, Dwelling, Thinking. In M. Heidegger, Poetry, Language, Thought. (pp. 143-161). Harper & Row.
  30. Heidegger, M. (1971b). ...Poetically Man Dwells... In M. Heidegger, Poetry, Language, Thought. (pp. 213-229). Harper & Row.
  31. Jonas, H. (1985). The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age. University of Chicago Press.
  32. Katz, E. (1991). Ethics and Philosophy of the Environment: A Brief Review of the Major Literature. Environmental History Review, 15(2), 79-86.
  33. Kohák, E. (1987). The Embers and the Stars. University of Chicago Press.
  34. LaFollette, H. (2005). The Oxford Handbook of Practical Ethics. Oxford University Press.
  35. Leopold, A. (1949). A Sand Country Almanac and Sketches Here and There. Oxford University Press.
  36. Light, A. (2001). The Urban Blind Spot in Environmental Ethics. Environmental Politics, 10(1), 7-35.
  37. Marcos, A. (2001). Ética ambiental. Universidad de Valladolid.
  38. McDonald, H. P. (2004). John Dewey and Environmental Philosophy. State University of New York Press.
  39. Morscher, E., Neumaier, O. & Simons, P. (2012). Applied Ethics in a Troubled World. Springer.
  40. Minteer, B. A. & Collins J. P. (2008). From Environmental to Ecological Ethics: Toward a Practical Ethics for Ecologists and Conservationists. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14(4), 483-501.
  41. Mies, M. & Shiva, V. (1993). Ecofeminism. Zed Books.
  42. Næss, A. (1973). The Shallow and the Deep, Long-Range Ecology Movement. A Summary. Inquiry, 16(1-4), 95-100.
  43. Næss, A. (1987). Self-Realization: An Ecological Approach to Being in the World. The Trumpeter, 4(3), 35-42.
  44. Næss, A. (1989a). Ecology, Community and Lifestyle: Outline of an Ecosophy. Cambridge University Press.
  45. Næss, A. (1989b). Ecosophy and Gestalt Ontology. The Trumpeter, 6(4), 134-137.
  46. Næss, A. (1993). Spinoza and the Deep Ecology Movement. Eburon.
  47. Næss, A. (1995). Deepness of Questions and the Deep Ecology Movement. In G. Sessions (ed.), Deep Ecology for the 21st Century. (pp. 204-212). Shambhala.
  48. Næss, A. (2005). The Basics of Deep Ecology. In H. Glasser, A. Drengson (eds.), The Selected Works of Arne Næss. Vol. X. (pp. 13-20). Springer.
  49. Norton, B. (1995). Why I Am Not Anthropocentrist. Environmental Ethics, 17, 341-358.
  50. Passmore, J. (1974). Man’s Responsibility for Nature: Ecological Problems and Western Traditions. Charles Scribner’s Sons.
  51. Plumwood, V. (1995). Nature, Self, and Gender. Feminism, Environmental Philosophy, and the Critique of Rationalism. In R. Elliot (ed.), Environmental Ethics. (pp. 155-164). Oxford University Press.
  52. Polo, L. (1996). La persona humana y su crecimiento. EUNSA.
  53. Potter, V. R. (1971). Bioethics. Bridge to the future. Prentice Hall.
  54. Potter, V. R. (1988). Global Bioethics. Building on the Leopold Legacy. Michigan State University Press.
  55. Regan, T. (1975). The Moral Basis of Vegetarianism. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 5(2), 181-214.
  56. Regan, T. (2004). The Day May Come: Legal Rights for Animals. Animal Law, 10, 11-24.
  57. Rolston, H. (1988). Environmental Ethics: Duties to and Values in the Natural World. Temple University Press.
  58. Russo, M. T. & Valera, L. (2015). Invito al ben-essere. Lineamenti di etica. Aracne.
  59. Russo, N. (2000). Filosofia ed ecologia. Idee sulla scienza e sulle prassi ecologiche. Guida.
  60. Ruether, R. (1996). Ecofeminism: Symbolic and Social Connections of the Oppression of Women and the Domination of Nature. Feminist Theology, 3(9), 35-50.
  61. Salleh, A. (1984). Deeper than Deep Ecology: The Eco-Feminist Connection. Environmental Ethics, 6(4), 335-341.
  62. Sandler, R. (2004). Towards an Adequate Environmental Virtue Ethic. Environmental Values, 13(4), 477-495.
  63. Sandler, R. (2007). Character and Environment: A Virtue-Oriented Approach to Environmental Ethics. Columbia University Press.
  64. Sandler, R. (2012). Intrinsic Value, Ecology, and Conservation. Nature Education Knowledge, 3(10), 4.
  65. Scruton, R. (2012). How to Think Seriously About the Planet. The Case for an Environmental Conservatism. Oxford University Press.
  66. Sessions, G. (1987). The Deep Ecology Movement: A Review. Environmental Review, 11(2), 105-125.
  67. Singer, P. (1986). Applied Ethics. Oxford University Press.
  68. Stine, J. K. & Tarr, J. A. (1998). At the Intersection of Histories: Technology and the Environment. Technology and Culture, 39(4), 601-640.
  69. Svoboda, T. (2012). Duties Regarding Nature: A Kantian Approach to Environmental Ethics. Kant Yearbook, 4(1), 143-144.
  70. Taylor, P. (1986). Respect for Nature: A Theory of Environmental Ethics. Princeton University Press.
  71. Todres, L. & Galvin, K. (2010). Dwelling-Mobility: An Existential Theory of Well-Being. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 5(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v5i3.5444.
  72. Traer, R. (2013). Doing Environmental Ethics. Westview Press.
  73. Valera, L. (2013). Ecologia umana. Le sfide etiche del rapporto uomo/ambiente. Aracne.
  74. Valera, L. (2015). Arne Næss. Introduzione all’ecologia. ETS.
  75. Valera, L. (2016a). El futuro de la ecología: la sabiduría como centro especulativo de la ética ambiental. Cuadernos de bioética, 27(3), 329-338.
  76. Valera, L. (2016b). ¿Qué es la ética ambiental? Desde sus raíces hacia el futuro. Cuadernos de bioética, 27(3), 289-292.
  77. Valera, L. (2017). La bioética de Potter: la búsqueda de la sabiduría en el origen de la bioética y de la ética ambiental. Medicina y ética. Revista internacional de bioética, deontología y ética médica, 28(2), 396-398.
  78. Von Uexküll, J. (1909). Umwelt und Innenwelt der Tiere. Springer.
  79. Warren, K. J. (1987). Feminism and Ecology: Making Connections. Environmental Ethics, 9(1), 3-20.
  80. Weston, A. (1985). Beyond Intrinsic Value: Pragmatism in Environmental Ethics. Environmental Ethics, 7, 321-339.
  81. Wood, A. & O’Neill, O. (1998). Kant on Duties Regarding Nonrational Nature. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 72, 189-228.
  82. Young, J. (2000). What is Dwelling? The Homelessness of Modernity and the Worlding of the World. In M. A. Wrathall & J. Malpas (eds.), Essays in Honor of Hubert L. Dreyfus: Heidegger, Authenticity, and Modernity. (pp. 187-204). The MIT Press.
  83. Zimmerman, M. (2012). Heidegger’s Phenomenology and Contemporary Environmentalism. In T. Toadvine & C. S. Brown (eds.), Eco-Phenomenology: Back to the Earth Itself. (pp. 73-102). State University of New York Press.