Publicado 2020-10-27
Palavras-chave
Como Citar
Downloads
Altmetrics
Citas
Resumo
The belief that Jastrow’s duck-rabbit (J) is both a duck-head and a rabbit-head drawing violates the Law of Non-Contradiction (LNC), as does the belief that J seems to be something independent of all the ways J can seem. Call the former belief B1 and the latter B2. I argue that B1 and B2 are rational, though contradictory beliefs, and conclude that we must reassess the LNC’s status of being a fundamental requirement for rationality. In contrast with B1 and B2, our experiences that correspond to said beliefs do comply with the LNC. That is: we cannot see J as both duck and rabbit at the same time (E1), nor does J seem something independent of the ways J can seem (E2). Since there is no satisfactory explanation for why we are not able to see J as the contradictions E1 or E2―even though our corresponding beliefs about J are the contradictions B1 and B2―I propose that the LNC is merely an empirical hypothesis concerning the limits of our perception.
Referências
- Addis, M. (2010). Seeing As. In E. Goldstein (ed.), Encyclopedia of Perception. (pp. 877-878). Sage Publications. Andersen, R. & Buneo, C. (2002). Intentional Maps in Posterior Parietal Cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 25(1), 189-220.
- Aristotle. (1928). The Works of Aristotle Translated into English. W. D. Ross (ed.). Clarendon Press.
- Beall, J. C. (2000). Is the Observable World Consistent? Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 78(1), 113-118.
- Berman, R. & Colby, C. (2009). Attention and Active Vision. Vision Research, 49(10), 1233-1248.
- Blake, R. (2009). Multistable Perception. In T. Bayne, A. Cleeremans & P. Wilken (eds.), The Oxford Companion to Consciousness. (pp. 455-457). Oxford University Press.
- Blake, R. & Logothetis, N.K. (2002). Visual Competition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3(1), 13-21.
- Chen, Q., Marshall, J., Weidner, R. & Fink, G. (2008). Zooming In and Zooming Out of the Attentional Focus: An fMRI Study. Cerebral Cortex, 19(4), 805-819.
- Churchland, P. M. (1988). Perceptual Plasticity and Theoretical Neutrality: A Reply to Jerry Fodor. Philosophy of Science, 55, 167-187.
- DeGraaf, T., DeJong, M., Goebel, R., VanEe, R. & Sack, A. (2011). On the Functional Relevance of Frontal Cortex for Passive and Voluntarily Controlled Bistable Vision. Cerebral Cortex, 21(10), 2322-2331.
- Dennett, D. (2002). Seeing Is Believing―Or Is It? In A. Noë and E. Thompson (eds.), Vision and Mind. (pp. 481-496). MIT Press.
- Dretske, F. (2006). Perception without Awareness. In T. Gendler & J. Hawthorne (eds.), Perceptual Experience. (pp. 147-180). Oxford University Press.
- He, S. (2010). Bistable Perception. In E. Goldstein (ed.), Encyclopedia of Perception. (pp. 213-215). Sage Publications.
- Heekeren, H. R., Marrett, S. & Ungerleider, L. G. (2008). The Neural Systems that Mediate Human Perceptual Decision Making. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9, 467-479.
- Helmholtz, H. (2013). Treatise on Physiological Optics, Volume III. Dover Publications.
- Hohwy, J., Roepstorff, A. & Friston, K. (2008). Predictive Coding Explains Binocular Rivalry: An Epistemological Review. Cognition, 108(3), 687-701.
- Ilg, R., Wohlschläger, A., Burazanis, S., Wöller, A., Nunnemann, S. & Mühlau, M. (2008). Neural Correlates of Spontaneous Impression Switches in Ambiguous Stimuli: An Event‐Related fMRI Study. European Journal of Neuroscience, 28(11), 2325-2332.
- Koch, C. (2004). The Quest for Consciousness: A Neurobiological Approach. Roberts & Co.
- Leibniz, G. W. (1989). New System of Nature. In R. Ariew and D. Garber (eds.), G. W. Leibniz: Philosophical Essays. (pp. 138-144). Hackett Classics.
- Leopold, D. A. & Logothetis, N. K. (1999). Multistable Phenomena: Changing Views in Perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(7), 254-264.
- Macpherson, F. (2006). Ambiguous Figures and the Content of Experience. Noûs, 40(1), 82-117.
- Macpherson, F. (2015). Cognitive Penetration and Nonconceptual Content. In T. Gendler & J. Hawthorne (eds.), The Cognitive Penetrability of Perception. (pp. 331-358). Oxford University Press.
- Maier, A. & Leopold, D. (2009). Binocular Rivalry. In T. Bayne, A. Cleeremans & P. Wilken (eds.), The Oxford Companion to Consciousness. (pp. 105-107). Oxford University Press.
- Orlandi, N. (2011). The Innocent Eye: Seeing-As without Concepts. American Philosophical Quarterly, 48(1), 17-31.
- Palmer, S. (1999). Vision Science: Photons to Phenomenology. MIT Press.
- Pettigrew, J. (2001). Searching for the Switch: Neural Bases for Perceptual Rivalry Alternations. Brain and Mind, 2(1), 85-118.
- Priest, G. (1999). Perceiving Contradictions. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 77(4) 439-446.
- Priest, G. (2008). Doubt Truth to Be a Liar. Oxford University Press.
- Siegel, S. (2016). The Contents of Perception. In E. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/perception-contents/.
- Sterzer, P., Kleinschmidt, A. & Rees, G. (2009). The Neural Bases of Multistable Perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(7), 310-318.
- Stokes, D. (2015). Towards a Consequentialist Understanding of Cognitive Penetration. In T. Gendler, and J. Hawthorne (eds.), The Cognitive Penetrability of Perception. (pp. 75-100). Oxford University Press.
- Vernet, M., Brem, A. K., Farzan, F. & Pascual-Leone, A. (2015). Synchronous and Opposite Roles of the Parietal and Prefrontal Cortices in Bistable Perception: A Double-Coil TMS–EEG Study. Cortex, 64, 78-88.
- Wilson, H. R. (2003). Computational Evidence for a Rivalry Hierarchy in Vision. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States, 100(24), 14499-14503.
- Wittgenstein, L. (2001). Philosophical Investigations. Blackwell.
- Wohlschlaeger, A. (2000) Visual Motion Priming by Invisible Actions. Vision Research, 40, 925–930.