No 67 (2023): Septiembre-diciembre
Artículos

The Dual Function of Socratic Irony in Philosophical Interactions: Kierkegaard’s Concept of Irony versus Alcibiades’ Speech

Publiée 2023-08-01

Comment citer

Mualem, S. (2023). The Dual Function of Socratic Irony in Philosophical Interactions: Kierkegaard’s Concept of Irony versus Alcibiades’ Speech. Tópicos, Revista De Filosofía, (67), 155–182. https://doi.org/10.21555/top.v670.2404

Téléchargements

Les données relatives au téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponibles.

Altmetrics

Citas

Résumé

This paper explores Socratic irony as reflected in the famous passages of Alcibiades’ speech in Plato’s Symposium, focusing on the relationship between ironic utterance and the philosophic guidance process. Reviewing the diverse meanings of the term eirôneia in Greek comedy and philosophy, it examines the way in which Plato employs irony in fashioning Socrates’ figure and depicting the ideal of philosophic guidance as the “art of midwifery.” It then analyzes Kierkegaard’s most positive perception of Socratic irony as a necessary methodical element in the Socratic maieutic process of “deceiving into the truth.” Contrasting Kierkegaard with Alcibiades’ scathing critique, it reads the latter in a combined dramatic-philosophical perspective, as presenting irony as an anti-philosophic phenomenon, leading to cognitive puzzlement and Dionysian irrationality. Alcibiades’ negative stance will be manifested via analyzing his use of four literary rhetorical devices: comparing Socrates with the Silenoi, drawing an analogy between ironic speech and Marysas’ satyric flute playing, symbolizing philosophy as snake venom, and presenting the scene of Socrates’ seduction as dramatic irony. The discussion shows, then, that there are two distinct manifestations of Socratic irony drawn from Plato’s writings, destructive and constructive, derived from the character of his philosophical pupils.

Références

  1. Allen, R. E. (1959). Anamnesis in Plato’s Meno and Phaedo. The Review of
  2. Metaphysics, 13(1), 165-174.
  3. Aristophanes. (1998). Aristophanes I: Clouds, Wasps, Birds. P. Meineck (trans.). Hackett.
  4. Aristotle. (1926a). Art of Rhetoric. J. H. Freese (trans.). Loeb Classical Library. Heinemann.
  5. Aristotle. (1926b). Nicomachean Ethics. H. Rackham (trans.). Loeb Classical Library. Heinemann.
  6. Boy-Stones, G. & Rowe, C. (2013). The Circle of Socrates: Reading in the First-Generation Socratics. Hackett.
  7. Corey, D. (2015). The Sophists in Plato’s Dialogues. SUNY Press.
  8. Diels, H. & Kranz, W. (1974). Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. Three volumes. Weidmann.
  9. Freeman, K. (1970). Ancilla to the Pre-Socratic Philosophers: A Complete Translation of the Fragments in Diels, Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. Harvard University Press.
  10. Friedlander, P. (1958). Plato: An Introduction. Princeton University Press.
  11. Guthrie, W. K. G. (1971). Socrates. Cambridge University Press.
  12. Hackforth, R. (1933). Great Thinkers. (I) Socrates. Philosophy, 8(31), 259-72.
  13. Helfer, A. (2017). Socrates and Alcibiades: Plato’s Drama of Political Ambition and Philosophy. University of Pennsylvania Press.
  14. Johansson, V. (2019). Pedagogy and Polyphonic Narrativity in Søren Kierkegaard. The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 53(4), 111-122.
  15. Kierkegaard, S. (1941). Concluding Unscientific Postscript. D. F. Swenson & W. Lowrie (trans.). Princeton University Press.
  16. Kierkegaard, S. (1967). Søren Kierkegaard’s Journals and Papers. Volume 1. H. V. Hong and E. H. Hong (trans.). Indiana University Press.
  17. Kierkegaard, S. (1989). The Concept of Irony. H. V. Hong & E. H. Hong (trans.). Princeton University Press.
  18. Kierkegaard, S. (2007). Kierkegaard’s Journals and Notebooks. Volume 1: Journals AA-DD. B. H. Kirmmse, N. J. Cappelørn, A. Hannay, G. Pattison, & J. Stewart (eds. and trans.). Princeton University Press.
  19. Lane, M. (2010). Reconsidering Socratic Irony. In G. F. Ferrari (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Socrates. (pp. 237-259). Cambridge University Press.
  20. Levinas, E. (1985). Ethics and Infinity. R. A. Cohen (trans.). Duquesne University Press.
  21. Lippitt, J. (2000). Humour and Irony in Kierkegaard’s Thought. Springer.
  22. Littman, R. J. (1970). The Loves of Alcibiades. Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association, 101, 263-276.
  23. Lutz, J. M. (2018). [Review of the book Socrates and Alcibiades: Plato’s Drama of Political Ambition and Philosophy, by Ariel Helfer]. The Review of Politics, 80(2), 378.
  24. Moore, C. (2019). Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Socrates. Brill.
  25. Morrison, D. (2007). The Utopian Character of Plato’s Ideal City. In G. F. Ferrari (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Socrates. (pp. 232-255). Cambridge University Press.
  26. Nietzsche, F. (2005). Twilight of the Idols. R. Polt (trans.). Hackett.
  27. Oppian. (1928). Oppian. Colluthus. Tryphiodorus. A. W. Mair (trans.). Loeb Classical Library. Heinemann.
  28. Plato. (1928). Theaetetus. Sophist. H. N. Fowler (trans.). Loeb Classical Library. Heinemann.
  29. Plato. (1929). Timaeus. Critias. Cleitophon. Menexenus, Epistles. R. G. Bury (trans.). Loeb Classical Library. Heinemann.
  30. Plato. (2013a). Republic. I. Books 1-5. C. Emlyn-Jones & W. Preddy (trans.). Loeb Classical Library. Harvard University Press.
  31. Plato. (2013b). Republic. II. Books 6-10. C. Emlyn-Jones & W. Preddy (trans.). Loeb Classical Library. Harvard University Press.
  32. Plato. (2017). Euthyphro. Apology. Crito. Phaedo. C. Emlyn-Jones (trans.). Loeb Classical Library. Harvard University Press.
  33. Plato. (2022). Lysis. Symposium. Phaedrus. C. Emlyn-Jones & W. Preddy (trans.). Loeb Classical Library. Harvard University Press.
  34. Press, G. H. (1993). Plato’s Dialogues. Rowman & Littlefield.
  35. Rosen, S. (1994). The Quarrel between Philosophy and Poetry. Routledge.
  36. Stewart, J. (2015). Søren Kierkegaard: Subjectivity, Irony, & the Crisis of Modernity. Oxford University Press.
  37. Söderquist, B. (2013). Irony. In J. Lippitt & G. Pattison (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Kierkegaard. (pp. 344-365). Oxford University Press.
  38. Söderquist, A. S. (2016). Kierkegaard on Dialogical Education: Vulnerable Freedom. Lexington Books.
  39. Vlastos, G. (1987). Socratic Irony. Classical Quarterly, 37(1), 79-96.
  40. Vlastos, G. (1991). Socrates: Ironist and Moral Philosopher. Cornell University Press.
  41. Wolfsdorf, D. (2007). The Irony of Socrates. Journal of Aesthetics, 65(2), 175-187.