Número 41 - 2011
Articles

El postulado de la inmortalidad del alma en la filosofía moral Kantiana: Parte I

Published 2013-11-28

How to Cite

Granja, D. M. (2013). El postulado de la inmortalidad del alma en la filosofía moral Kantiana: Parte I. Tópicos, Revista De Filosofía, 41(1), 249–280. https://doi.org/10.21555/top.v41i1.80

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Altmetrics

Citas

Abstract

The aim of this article is to clarify the grounds of Kant’s practical postulate of the immortality of the soul. In order to do that, I discuss some passages of the Critique of Pure Reason, in which Kant explains the nature of antinomies and the reasons why these cannot be theoretically solved. After that, my next step will be to elucidate the connection in Kant’s philosophy between the moral law and the intelligible world. By doing so, I explore the arguments in the Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals and the Critique of Practical Reason that prove that there is a practical access to the intelligible world, which is banned to those who consider the problems of antinomies –specially, the problem of human freedom– solely from a theoretical standpoint. I then reconstruct Kant’s view about the nature of practical postulates. In this regard, my analysis will focus on the notion of moral progress, which is, according to Kant, the actual motive that prompts us human beings to suppose legitimately our enduring existence after death. Lastly, I discuss the problematic nature of the notion of moral progress –which implies temporality–, and try to provide some reasonable grounds as to why it is nevertheless sound and cogent within Kant’s system.

References

  1. Allison, Henry: Kant´s Theory of Freedom, Cambridge University Press 1990, pp. 67, 171-173, 273-274.
  2. Bruch, Jean Louis: La philosophie religieuse de Kant, Aubier 1968, pp. 117-125.
  3. Chingnell, Andrew: “Belief in Kant” en Philosophical Review, 116, 3, July, 2007, pp. 323-360.
  4. Galbraith, Elizabeth: Kant and theology: was Kant a closet theologian?, London: International Scholar Publications 1996, cap. V, esp. pp. 137 y ss.
  5. Insole, Christopher: “The Irreducible Importance of Religious Hope in Kant’s Conception of the Highest Good”, Philosophy, 83, 2008, The Royal Institute of Philosophy, pp. 333-351.
  6. Korsgaard, Christine: “Self-constitution in the Ethics of Plato and Kant”, en The Journal of Ethics 3, 1999, 1–29.
  7. Korsgaard, Christine: Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity and Integrity, Oxford University Press 2009, pp. XII, 117-121, 123, 125, 130, 133-142, 145, 147, 152-165, 170, 175-178, 180-182, 206, 213.
  8. Korsgaard, Christine: La creación del reino de los fines, México: UAM-UNAM 2011, pp. 47, 57, 59, 89-92, 357, 109, 91.
  9. Perovich, Anthony: “For Reason…also has its Mysteries”: Immortality, Religion and The end of all things”, en Philip J. Rossi & Michael Wreen (eds.), Kant´s philosophy of religion reconsidered, Indiana University Press 1991, pp. 165-180.
  10. Reardon, Bernard: Kant as Philosophical Theologian, Barnes & Noble 1988, pp. 65-67
  11. Schwarz, Gerhard: Est Deus in nobis, Die Identität von Gott und reiner praktischer Vernunft in Immanuel Kants “Kritik der praktischen Vernunft”, Berlin 2004, pp. 160-165.
  12. Wood, Allen: Kant´s Moral Religion, Ithaca New York: Cornell University Press 1970, pp. 176-182, 226-232.