No. 68 (2024): Enero - abril
Articles

Towards a Historically Bounded Rationality: Herbert A. Simon’s Critique of the Neoclassical Notion of the Rational Agent

XML (Español (España)) PDF (Español (España))
  • Josafat I. Hernández Cervantes
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21555/top.v680.2374

Published 2023-12-07

Keywords

How to Cite

Hernández Cervantes, J. I. (2023). Towards a Historically Bounded Rationality: Herbert A. Simon’s Critique of the Neoclassical Notion of the Rational Agent. Tópicos, Revista De Filosofía, (68), 35–68. https://doi.org/10.21555/top.v680.2374

Copyright (c) 2023 Tópicos, Revista de Filosofía

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Altmetrics

Citas

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

This article presents Herbert A. Simon’s critique of the two basic assumptions of the neoclassical notion of agent: perfect rationality and self-interest. It shows how Simon criticized both assumptions by recognizing that the cognitive capacities of agents are limited, showing that there are specific problems that do not have optimal solutions and that there are other motivations irreducible to self-interest, such as loyalty and group identification, which are fundamental for understanding the behavior of organizations. It is shown how Simon pointed towards a notion of rationality that is historically bounded by the interaction of the agent with its environment, which presents a complex and dynamic vision of human behavior. However, the article also shows the difficulties Simon had in achieving the full realization of this project by assuming an assumption of individualistic cognition that prevented him from giving a more substantive role to the environment in structuring agents’ behaviors. It ends by showing how the notion of habit can give a more substantive role to the environment in order to develop a historically bounded conception of rationality.

XML (Español (España)) PDF (Español (España))

References

  1. Angner, E. y Loewenstein, G. (2012). Behavioral Economics. En U. Mäki (ed.), Philosophy of Economics. (pp. 641-690). Elsevier. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-51676-3.50022-1.
  2. Arthur, W. B. (2015). Complexity and the Economy. Oxford University Press.
  3. Augier, M. y March, J. G. (2004). Herbert A. Simon, Scientist. En M. Augier y J. G. March (eds.), Models of a Man: Essays in Memory of Herbert A. Simon. Volumen 1. (pp. 3-32). The MIT Press.
  4. Becker, G. (1993) Nobel Lecture: The Economic Way of Looking at Behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 101(3), 385-409. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/261880.
  5. Berg, N. y Gigerenzer, G. (2010). As-if Behavioral Economics: Neoclassical Economics in Disguise? History of Economics Ideas, 18, 1000-1033.
  6. Bonome, M. G. (2009). La racionalidad en la toma de decisiones: análisis de la teoría de la decisión de Herbert A. Simon. Netbiblo.
  7. Bourdieu, P. (2000). Pascalian Meditations. R. Nice (trad.). Stanford University Press.
  8. Bowles, S. (2014). Niccolò Machiavelli and the Origins of Mechanism Design. Journal of Economic Issues, 48(2), 267-278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/JEI0021-3624480202.
  9. Chemero, A. (2011). Radical Embodied Cognitive Science. The MIT Press.
  10. Cohen, M. (2007). Reading Dewey: Reflections on the Study of Routine. Organization Studies, 28(5), SAGE Publications.
  11. Dewey, J. (2002). Human Nature and Conduct: An Introduction to Social Psychology. Prometheus.
  12. Elster, J. (2011). El desinterés. Tratado crítico del hombre económico. (I). R. Ancira (trad.). Siglo XXI.
  13. Echeverría, J. y Álvarez, J. F. (2008). Bounded Rationality in Social Sciences. En E. Agazzi, J. Echeverría y A. Gómez Rodríguez (eds.), Epistemology and the Social. (pp. 173-191). Brill.
  14. Estrada, F. (2007) Herbert A. Simon y la economía organizacional. Cuadernos de Economía, 26(46), 169-199.
  15. Fonseca Patrón, A. L. (2019). Cognición situada y racionalidad. Hacia una ecología interactiva del razonamiento. Diánoia, 64(83), 103-131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22201/iifs.18704913e.2019.83.1618.
  16. Friedman, M. y Savage, L. (1952). The Expected-Utility Hypothesis and the Measurability of Utility. Journal of Political Economy, 60(6), 463-474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/257308.
  17. Gigerenzer, G. (2008). Rationality for Mortals: How People Cope with Uncertainty. Oxford University Press.
  18. González, W. J. (2003) Racionalidad y Economía. De la racionalidad de la economía como ciencia a la racionalidad de los agentes económicos. En W. J. Gonzalez (ed.), Racionalidad, historicidad y predicción en Herbert A. Simon. (pp. 65-96). Netbiblo.
  19. Heidl, S. (2016). Philosophical Problems of Behavioral Economics. Routledge.
  20. Hernández Cervantes, J. I. (2019). Racionalidad acotada, heurísticas y hábitos. Implicaciones de diferentes caracterizaciones del razonamiento heurístico para la formulación de políticas públicas. [Tesis doctoral]. UNAM.
  21. Heukelom, F. (2014). Behavioral economics: A history. Cambridge University Press.
  22. Hortal, A. (2017). Empiricism in Herbert Simon: Administrative Behavior Within the Evolution of the Models of Bounded and Procedural Rationality. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 37, 719-733. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-31572017v37n04a04.
  23. Kahneman, D. y Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 47(2), 263-291.
  24. Kirchgässner, G. (2014). On Self-Interest and Greed. Journal of Business Economics, 84(9), 1191-1209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-014-0737-1.
  25. Laibson, D. y List, J. A. (2015). Principles of (Behavioral) Economics. American Economic Review, 105(5), 385-390. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20151047.
  26. Lazear, E. (2000). Economic Imperialism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(1), 99-146 https://doi.org/10.1162/003355300554683
  27. Mäki, U. (2008). Filosofía y metodología de la economía. Cátedra Bolívar. Temas de teoría económica y su método 2. J. J. Jardón Urrieta (trad.). Universidad de Santiago de Compostela. URL: https://www.google.com/url?client=internal-element-cse&cx=007758419574493913536:b3wgmoma76g&q=https://www.usc.es/economet/aeeadepdf/aeeade104.pdf&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwiS-t-5uaaBAxVDFBAIHZELB7UQFnoECAcQAQ&usg=AOvVaw3RkhzPe3CBeD40LDBoLsHs.
  28. Mandeville, B. (1997). The Fable of the Bees and Other Writings. Hackett Publishing.
  29. Martínez, S. F. (2003). Geografía de las prácticas científicas. Racionalidad, heurística y normatividad. UNAM.
  30. Martínez, S. F. (2016). Cultura material y cognición social. En P. Hernández, J. García y M. Romo (ed.), Cognición. Estudios multidisciplinarios. (pp. 247-264). Centro de Estudios Filosóficos, Políticos y Sociales Vicente Lombardo Toledano.
  31. Merleau-Ponty, M. (2013). Phenomenology of Perception. C. Smith (trad.). Routledge.
  32. Mill, J. S. (2010). The Basic Writings of John Stuart Mill: On Liberty, the Subjection of Women and Utilitarianism. Modern Library.
  33. Morgan, M. S. (2012). The World in the Model: How Economists Work and Think. Cambridge University Press
  34. Morgenstern, O. y Von Neumann, J. (1953). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton University Press.
  35. Muth, J. F. (1961). Rational Expectations and the Theory of Price Movements. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 29(3), 315-335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1909635.
  36. Newell, A. (1983). The Heuristic of George Polya and Its Relation to Artificial Intelligence. En R. Groner, M. Groner y W. F. Bischoo (eds.), Methods of Heuristics. (pp. 195-243). Lawrence Erlbaum.
  37. Ross, D. (2014). Philosophy of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan.
  38. Sargent, T. J. (1993). Bounded Rationality in Macroeconomics: The Arne Ryde Memorial Lectures. Oxford University Press.
  39. Segoviano Contreras, L. E. y Morales Sánchez, M. A. (2021). El principio de interés propio en el análisis y el diseño económico. Interdisciplina, 9(25), 185-208.
  40. Sen, A. K. (1977). Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations
  41. of Economic Theory. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 317-344. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2264946.
  42. Sen, A. K. (2005). Why Exactly Is Commitment Important for Rationality? Economics & Philosophy, 21(1), 5-14. DOI: 10.1017/S0266267104000355.
  43. Simon, H. A. (1947). Administrative Behavior. A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization. The Free Press-Collier Macmillan.
  44. Simon, H. A. (1955). A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99-118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1884852.
  45. Simon, H. A. (1956). Rational Choice and the Structure of the Environment. Psychological Review, 63(2), pp. 129-138. DOI: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0042769.
  46. Simon, H. A. (1969). The Sciences of the Artificial. The MIT Press.
  47. Simon, H. A. (1979). Rational Decision Making in Business Organizations. The American Economic Review, 69(4), 493-513.
  48. Simon, H. A. (1990). Invariants of Human Behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 41(1), 1-20.
  49. Simon, H. A. (1993). Altruism and Economics. The American Economic Review, 83(2), 156-161.
  50. Simon, H. A. (1994). Testability and Approximation. En D. M. Hausman (ed.), The Philosophy of Economics: An Anthology. (pp. 214-216). Cambridge University Press.
  51. Simon, H. A. (1995). Rationality in Political Behavior. Political Psychology, 16(1), 45-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3791449.
  52. Simon, H. A. (1997). An Empirically Based Microeconomics. Cambridge University Press.
  53. Simon, H. A. (1998). Economics as a Historical Science. Theoria: An international Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science, 13(2), 241-260.
  54. Simon, H. A. y Newell, A. (1958). Heuristic Problem Solving: The Next Advance in Operations Research. Operations Research, 6(1), 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.6.1.1.
  55. Simon, H. A. y Newell, A. (1962). Computer Simulation of Human Thinking and Problem Solving. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 27(2), 137-150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1165535.
  56. Smith, A. (2004). La teoría de los sentimientos morales. C. Rodríguez Braun (trad.). Alianza.
  57. Thaler, R. (2015). Misbehaving: The Making of Behavioral Economics. Norton.
  58. Zerubavel, E. y Smith, E. R. (2010). Transcending Cognitive Individualism. Social Psychology Quarterly, 73(4), 321-325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0190272510388998.