Número 28 - 2005
Articles

Phantasia em Platão

Published 2013-11-28

How to Cite

Marques, M. (2013). Phantasia em Platão. Tópicos, Revista De Filosofía, 28(1), 57–82. https://doi.org/10.21555/top.v28i1.225

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Altmetrics

Citas

Abstract

This paper deals with the meaning of phantasia in Plato's dialogues, taking into account the dialectical contexts in which different representations and opinions are examined and submitted to refutation: the gods' apparitions as pictured by the poets are not a good basis for the citizens' paideia (Republic), nor are the apparitions in perception solid knowledge (Theaetetus); the verbal images produced by the sophists are unsound (Sophist) and should, like the images projected on the liver (Timaeus), be the object of critical analysis and interpretation. Nevertheless, it is argued that, in the dialogues as a whole, phantasia is not, a priori, false.

References

  1. Aubenque, P. (1987). Etudes sur Parménide. Vol. 1. Paris: Vrin.
  2. Bluck, R. S. (1975). Plato’s Sophist, a commentary. Manchester: G. C. Neal.
  3. Bundy, M. W. (1927). The theory of imagination in classical and mediaeval thought. Urabana: University of Illinois.
  4. Burnyeat, M. (1998). Introduction au Thétète de Platon. M. Nancy (trad.) Paris: Puf.
  5. Cornford, F. M. (1935). Plato’s theory of knowledge. The Theaetetus and the Sophist of Plato. London and New York: Kegan Paul, Trech, Trubner and Harcourt Brace.
  6. Desclos, M. L. (2000). Idoles, icônes et phantasmes dans les dialogues de Platon. En Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale, 3.
  7. ____ (2001). Une façon platonicienne d’être une image: le minema. En Classica, 13 (14): 205-217.
  8. Dixsaut, M. (1994). Le naturel philosophe. Essai sur les dialogues de Platon. Paris: Vrin.
  9. Fine, G. (2000). Conflicting appearances: Theaetetus 153D-154B. En Form and argument in late Plato. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  10. Frere, J. (1980). Les origins grecques du problème de la représentation. En Actes du Congrès de l’Association des Sociétès de Philosophie de Langue Française, 18.
  11. Marques, M. (1990). O caminho poético de Parmênides. São Paulo: Loyola.
  12. ____ (2000/2001). Imagem e aporía no Sofista de Platão.
  13. ____ (2003). A significação dialética das aporías no Eutidemo de Platão. En Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofía, 29 (1): 5-32.
  14. Palumbo, L. (1994). Il non essere e l’apparenza. Sul Sofista di Platone. Napoli: Loffredo Editore.
  15. Platón. (1925). Sophiste. A. Diès (trad.) Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
  16. ____ (1959-1960). OEvres Complètes. L. Robin (trad.) Paris: Gallimard.
  17. ____ (1993). Sophiste. N. L. Cordero (trad.) Paris: GF-Flammarion.
  18. Said, S. (1987). Deux noms de l’image en grec ancien: idole et icône. En Comptes Rendues de l’Académie des Inscriptions et des Belles Lettres.
  19. Teisserenc, F. (1999). L’empire du faux ou le plaisir de l’image. Philèbe 37A-41A. En La fêlure du plaisir. Etudes sur le Philèbe de Platon. M. Dixsaut (ed.) (267-297). Paris: Vrin.
  20. Thayer, H. S. (1977). Plato on the morality of imagination. En The Review of Metaphysics, 4: 594-618.
  21. Vernant, J. P. (1975). Image et apparence dans la théorie platonicienne de la mimesis. En Journal de Psychologie Normale et Pathologique, 62: 133-160.
  22. Villela-Petit, M. P. (2003). Platão e a poesia na República. En Kriterion, 107: 51-71.
  23. Watson, G. (1986). Imagination: the Greek background. En The Irish Theological Quaterly, 52 (1): 54-65.