Número 44 - 2013
Artículos

Reliabilism and Demon World Victims

Jennifer Wilson Mulnix
University of Massachusetts, Dartmouth

Publicado 2013-09-30

Cómo citar

Mulnix, J. W. (2013). Reliabilism and Demon World Victims. Tópicos, Revista De Filosofía, (44), 35–82. https://doi.org/10.21555/top.v0i44.2

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Altmetrics

Citas

Resumen

En este trabajo se defiende el fiabilismo frente al experimento mental clásico del "genio maligno". Al hacerlo, enfatizo dos de sus supuestos clave; y después desarrollo una serie de variadas respuestas asequibles al fiabilista, mostrando que las mismas pueden ser útiles para explicar o negar las intuiciones iniciales de la propuesta del "genio maligno", de una manera consistente con el fiabilismo. Mi conclusión es que el experimento del "genio maligno" no socava  la fiablidad como el sello distintivo de la justificación epistémica.

Citas

  1. Alston, W. (1985). “Concepts of Epistemic Justification”, Monist 68: 57-89.
  2. —. (1988). “An Internalist Externalism”, Synthese 74: 265-283.
  3. —. (1995). “How to Think About Reliability”, Philosophical Topics 23: 1-29.
  4. —. (2005). Beyond ‘Justification’: Dimensions of Epistemic Evaluation. Cornell UP, Ithaca.
  5. Bach, K. (1985). “A Rationale for Reliabilism”, Monist 68: 246-263.
  6. Beebe, J. (2004). “The Generality Problem, Statistical Relevance, and the Tri-Level Hypothesis”, Nous 38: 177-195.
  7. BonJour, L. (1980). “Externalists Theories of Empirical Knowledge”, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 5: 53-74.
  8. Brown, J. (2004). Anti-Individualism and Knowledge. MIT Press, Cambridge.
  9. Burge, T. (1979). “Individualism and the Mental”, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 94: 73-122.
  10. —. (1988). “Individualism and Self-Knowledge”, Journal of Philosophy 85: 649-63.
  11. Chisholm, R. (1948). “The Problem of Empiricism”, Journal of Philosophy 45: 512-517.
  12. Cohen, S. (1984). “Justification and Truth”, Philosophical Studies 46: 279-295.
  13. Conee, E., and R. Feldman. (1998). “The Generality Problem for Reliabilism”, Philosophical Studies 89: 1-29.
  14. —. (2001). “Internalism defended”. In H. Kornblith (ed.), Epistemology: Internalism and Externalism. Blackwell, Malden, 231-260.
  15. Engel, M. (1992). “Personal and Doxastic Justification in Epistemology”, Philosophical Studies 67: 133-150.
  16. Feldman, R. (1985). “Reliability and Justification”, Monist 68: 159-174.
  17. Feldman, R., and E. Conee. (2002). “Typing Problems”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65: 98-105.
  18. Fumerton, R. (1985). Metaphysical and Epistemological Problems of Perception. U. of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.
  19. —. (1990). Reason and Morality. Cornell UP, Ithaca.
  20. —. (1995). Metaepistemology and Skepticism. Rowman & Littlefield, Maryland. Goldman, A. I. (1967). “A Causal Theory of Knowing”, Journal of Philosophy 64: 355-372.
  21. —. (1979). “Reliabilism: What is Justified Belief?” In G.S. Pappas (ed.), Justification and Knowledge. D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1-23.
  22. —. (1986). Epistemology and Cognition. Harvard UP, Cambridge.
  23. —. (1988). “Strong and Weak Justification”, Philosophical Perspectives 2: 51-69.
  24. —. (1993). “Epistemic Folkways and Scientific Epistemology”, Philosophical Issues 3:271-285.
  25. —. (1998). “Reliabilism”. In E. Craig (ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Routledge, London, 204-208.
  26. —. (1999). “A Priori Warrant and Naturalistic Epistemology”, Philosophical Perspectives 13: 1-28.
  27. Greco, J. (2006). “Virtue, Luck and the Pyrrhonian Problematic”, Philosophical Studies 130: 9-34.
  28. Kitcher, P. (1980). “A Priori Knowledge”, Philosophical Review 89: 3-23.
  29. Kripke, S. (1972). Naming and Necessity. Harvard UP, Cambridge.
  30. Lehrer, K., and S. Cohen. (1983). “Justification, Truth, and Coherence”, Synthese 55: 191-207.
  31. Mill, J.S. (1861). Utilitarianism. In J.B. Robson (ed.), The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, (1963-1991). Univ. of Toronto Press, Toronto; Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
  32. Mulnix, J.W. (2008). “Reliabilism, Intuition, and Mathematical Knowledge”, Filozofia 62: 715-723.
  33. —. (2012). “Rethinking the A Priori/A Posteriori Distinction”, Logos & Episteme 3: 261-277.
  34. —. (in progress). “Reliabilism, Demon Worlds, and Two Senses of Epistemic Evaluation”.
  35. Mulnix, M.J. (unpublished manuscript). “Act Utilitarianism and Moral Character”.
  36. Nozick, R. (1981). Philosophical Explanations. Harvard UP, Cambridge.
  37. Plantinga, A. (1993a). Warrant: The Current Debate. Oxford UP, Oxford.
  38. —. (1993b). Warrant and Proper Function. Oxford UP, Oxford.
  39. Putnam, H. (1975). “The Meaning of ‘Meaning’”. In Philosophical Papers, Vol. II: Mind, Language, and Reality. Cambridge UP, Cambridge, 215-271.
  40. Pryor, J. (2001). “Highlights of Recent Epistemology”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52: 95-124.
  41. Sosa, E. (1985). “Knowledge and Intellectual Virtue”, Monist 68: 226-245.
  42. —. (1991). Knowledge in Perspective: Selected Essays in Epistemology. Cambridge UP, Cambridge.
  43. Tye, M. (1995). Ten Problems of Consciousness: A Representational Theory of the Phenomenal Mind. MIT Press, Cambridge.