No. 55 (2018): Julio-diciembre
Articles

Right and Sanction. The Notion of Judicial Punishment in Kant and Hegel

PDF (Español (España)) XML (Español (España))
  • Eduardo Charpenel
Eduardo Charpenel
Universidad Panamericana. Facultad de Filosofía.
Bio
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21555/top.v0i55.857

Published 2018-06-08

Keywords

How to Cite

Charpenel, E. (2018). Right and Sanction. The Notion of Judicial Punishment in Kant and Hegel. Tópicos, Revista De Filosofía, (55), 163–188. https://doi.org/10.21555/top.v0i55.857
Copyright Notice

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Altmetrics

Citas

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

In this article I compare the theories of legal punishment found in Kant’s and Hegel’s philosophy of right. The thesis I defend is that, at least in this subject matter, the positions of Kant and Hegel should not be read as standing in direct opposition, but rather as belonging to the family of retributivist penal theo-ries. The comparative analysis I put forward aims to shed light both on structural aspects of their philosophy of right as a whole and on some of their customary strategies of judicial-philosoph-ical justification. The discussion hereby presented will show, however, some limitations of both theories and broadly sketch, as a systematic solution to such difficulties, a reading in which Kant’s and Hegel’s philosophical conceptions of legal punish-ment are deemed as complementary ones.

PDF (Español (España)) XML (Español (España))

References

  1. Bibliografía
  2. Cesare Beccaria, De los delitos y las penas, Madrid, Alianza, 2014.
  3. Clayton Bohnet, Logic and the Limits of Philosophy in Kant and Hegel, Londres, Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.
  4. B. Sharon Byrd, “Kant’s Theory of Punishment: Deterrence in its Threat, Retribution in its Execution”, Law and Philosophy, no. 8 (2), 1989.
  5. B. Sharon Byrd y Joachim Hruschka, Kant’s Doctrine of Right. A Commentary, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2010.
  6. D.E. Cooper, “Hegel’s Theory of Punishment”, en Z. A. Pelczynski (ed.), Hegel’s Political Philosophy. Problems and Perspectives, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  7. Samuel Fleischacker, Kant’s Theory of Punishment, Kant Studien, no. 79, 1988.
  8. Eckart Förster, Die 25 Jahre der Philosophie, Frankfurt, Klostermann, 2012.
  9. G.W.F. Hegel, Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts, Frankfurt, Suhrkamp, 1986.
  10. G.W.F. Hegel, Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Geschichte, Frankfurt, Suhrkamp, 1986.
  11. G.W.F. Hegel, Principios de la filosofía del derecho, Juan Luis Vermal (trad.), Barcelona, Edhasa, 2005.
  12. Dietrich Henrich (ed.), Kant oder Hegel? Formen der Begründung in der Philosophie, Stuttgart, Kett-Clotta, 1983.
  13. Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2003.
  14. Stephen Houlgate, “Hegel’s Ethical Thought”, Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain, no. 25, 1992.
  15. Immanuel Kant, Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Rechtslehre, Hamburg, Felix Meiner, 2009.
  16. Immanuel Kant, Metafísica de las costumbres, Adela Cortina Orts y Jesús Conill Sancho (trads.), Madrid, Tecnos, 2005.
  17. Immanuel Kant, “Metaphysik der Sitten Vigilantius”. En: Gesammelte Schriften XXVII (2,1), Berlín, Walter de Gruyter, 1975.
  18. Dudley Knowles, Hegel and the Philosophy of Right, Londres y Nueva York, Routledge, 2002.
  19. Mary Margaret Mackenzie, Plato on Punishment, Berkeley y Los Ángeles, University of California Press, 1981.
  20. Georg Mohr, “Unrecht und Strafe (§§82-104)”, en Ludwig Siep (ed.), G.W.F. Hegel. Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts, Berlín, Akademie Verlag, 1997.
  21. Leslie A. Mulholland, Kant’s System of Rights, Nueva York, Columbia University Press, 1990.
  22. Thomas Pogge, “Is Kant’s Rechtslehre a ‘Comprehensive Liberalism’”, en Mark Timmons (ed.), Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals. Interpretative Essays, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  24. Paul Ricoeur, Lo justo, Agustín Domingo Moratalla (trad.), Sevilla, Caparrós Editores, 2003.
  25. Sally Sedgwick, The Reception of Kant’s Critical Philosophy. Fichte, Schelling, and Hegel, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2000.
  26. Sally Sedgwick, Hegel’s Critique of Kant. From Dichotomy to Identity, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012.
  27. Arthur Shuster, “Kant on the Role of the Retributive Outlook in Moral and Political Life”, The Review of Politics, no. 73, 2011.
  28. Robert Stern, Understanding Moral Obligation. Kant, Hegel, and Kierkegaard, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2012.
  29. Mark Tunick, Punishment. Theory and Practice, Berkeley y Los Ángeles, University of California Press, 1981.
  30. Alejandro Vigo, “Ética y derecho según Kant”, Tópicos, 41, 2011.
  31. Allen W. Wood, Hegel’s Ethical Thought, Cambridge, CUP, 1990.