No. 53 (2017): Julio-diciembre
Articles

Intentional Ascription in Cases of Schizophrenia: A Davidsonian Perspective

PDF (Español (España)) XML (Español (España))
  • María Emilia Vilatta
María Emilia Vilatta
Instituto de Humanidades, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, CONICET.
Bio
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21555/top.v0i53.814

Published 2017-07-01

Keywords

How to Cite

Vilatta, M. E. (2017). Intentional Ascription in Cases of Schizophrenia: A Davidsonian Perspective. Tópicos, Revista De Filosofía, (53), 11. https://doi.org/10.21555/top.v0i53.814
Copyright Notice

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Altmetrics

Citas

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

Currently, there is an ongoing discussion regarding the possibility to extend Donald Davidson's account of intentional ascription to cases of deluded subjects suffering different psychiatric disorders. Particularly, regarding to severe cases of schizophrenia, some authors have claimed that, due to the irrational thinking and behavior of these subjects, they cannot satisfy rationality constrains to be considered intentional agents. Therefore, in these cases, it cannot be even possible to identify mental contents of their delusions. In this paper, I will challenge this view and, by linking the debate about animal rationality and rationality in subjects with schizophrenia, I will argue that, once revised and qualified some principles of Davidson's approach, it can be gradually and legitimately extended to delusional subjects suffering schizophrenia, even in severe cases. In addition, I will propose two methodological strategies that are able to produce evidence in favor of the attribution of –at least– some simple beliefs to these subjects, without having stopped treating them as agents with some degree of intentionality. 

PDF (Español (España)) XML (Español (España))

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-IV-TR (4th ed., text revision.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
  2. American Psychiatric Association (2014). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-V-TR (5th ed., text revision). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
  3. Bennett, J. (1976). Linguistic Behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  4. Bermúdez, J.L. (2003). Thinking Without Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  5. Berrios, G. E. (1991). Delusions as “Wrong Beliefs”: a Conceptual History. En The British Journal of Psychiatry. Supplement, (14), 6–13.
  6. Bortolotti, L. (2005). Delusions and the Background of Rationality. En Mind and Language, 20 (2), 189–208. doi:10.1111/j.02681064.2005.00282.x
  7. Campbell, J. (2009). What does Rationality have to do with Psychological Causation? Propositional Attitudes as Mechanisms and as Control Variables. En Psychiatry as Cognitive Neuroscience: Philosophical Perspectives. M. Broome & L. Bortolo i (eds.)(137–149). Oxford:
  8. Oxford University Press.
  9. Carruthers, P. (2008). Meta-Cognition in Animals: A Skeptical Look. En Mind and Language, 23, 58-89.
  10. ____ (2006). The Architecture of the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  11. Cherniak, C. (1986). Minimal Rationality. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  12. Crane, T. (2009). Is Perception a Propositional Attitude? En Philosophical Quarterly, 59 (236), 452-469.
  13. Darias Martín M., Fernández Cabrera, N., Gutiérrez, M., López Florido, G. Pérez Chico, D. y Pérez Torres, L. (1997). Aspectos internos y externos de la racionalidad: ¿cuáles son los umbrales de racionalidad exigibles y cómo situarlos? En Contextos, 15 (29), 153-178.
  14. Davidson, D. (2004). Problems of rationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  15. ____ (2003). Subjetivo, intersubjetivo, objetivo. Madrid: Cátedra.
  16. ____ (2001). Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  17. ____ (1997). La aparición del pensamiento. En Subjetivo, intersubjetivo, objetivo. (170-190). Madrid: Cátedra.
  18. ____ (1985). Incoherence and irrationality. En Dialectica, XXXIX, 345-354.
  19. ____ (1982). Two Paradoxes of Irrationality. En Philosophical Essays on Freud. R. Wollheim & J. Hopkins (eds.) (289-305). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  20. ____ (1980). Essays on Actions and Events. New York: Oxford University Press.
  21. ____ (1974). Beliefs and the Basis of Meaning. En Synthese, 27, 309-323.
  22. ____ (1973). Radical Interpretation. En Dialectica, 27, 314–28.
  23. Dennett, D. (2000). Tipos de mente. Madrid: Debate.
  24. ____ (1971). Intentional Systems. En The Journal of Philosophy, 68 (4), 87- 106.
  25. Fulford, K., Thornton, T. & Graham, G. (2006). The Oxford Textbook of Philosophy and Psychiatry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  26. Gerrans, P. (2004). Cognitive Architecture and the Limits of Interpretationism. En Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 11 (1), 43–48. doi:10.1353/ppp.2004.0039
  27. Glock, H. J. (2003). Quine and Davidson on Language, Though and Reality. Cambridge: University Press.
  28. ____ (2000). Animals, Thoughts and Concepts. En Synthese, 123, 35-64.
  29. Hecker, E. (1995). La hebefrenia. Contribución a la psiquiatría clínica. En Revista de la Asociación Española de Neuropsiquiatría, 15 (53), 97-103.
  30. Klee, R. (2004). Why Some Delusions Are Necessarily Inexplicable Beliefs. En Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 11 (1), 25–34. doi:10.1353/ppp.2004.0044
  31. Lurz, R. (2009). Animal Minds. En Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Recuperado de: http://www.iep.utm.edu/ani-mind/.
  32. ____ (2007). In Defense of Wordless Thoughts about Thoughts. En Mind and Language, 22, 270-296.
  33. Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) (1992). CIE-10.Clasificación internacional de las enfermedades, trastornos mentales y del comportamiento (10° ed.) Madrid: Méditor.
  34. Prinz, J. (2002). Furnishing the Mind. Concepts and their Perceptual Basis. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  35. Reimer, M. (2012). Davidsonian Holism in Recent Philosophy of Psychiatry. En Donald Davidson on Truth, Meaning, and the Mental. G. Preyer (ed.) (249-269). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI:10.1093/ acprof:oso/9780199697519.003.0012
  36. ____ (2011). A Davidsonian Perspective on Psychiatric Delusions. En Philosophical Psychology, 24(5), 659–677. doi:10.1080/09515089.2011.5 62642
  37. Schwitzgebel, E. (1997). Words about Young Minds: The Concepts of Theory, Representation, and Belief in Philosophy and Developmental Psychology. Dissertation. Department of Philosophy, U.C. Berkeley. Recuperado de: http://www.faculty.ucr.edu/~eschwitz/SchwitzPapers/Diss.pdf
  38. Searle, J. (1996). Intencionalidad. Madrid: Tecnos.