No. 65 (2023): Enero - abril
Articles

J. M. Keynes’s Criticism of J. Bernoulli’s Project of Mathematizing Probability

Francisco Javier Aristimuño
Universidad Nacional de Rio Negro. Centro de Estudios en Ciencia
Bio

Published 2022-12-02

How to Cite

Aristimuño, F. J. (2022). J. M. Keynes’s Criticism of J. Bernoulli’s Project of Mathematizing Probability. Tópicos, Revista De Filosofía, (65), 269–304. https://doi.org/10.21555/top.v650.2068

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Altmetrics

Citas

Abstract

A hundred years after the publication of A Treatise on Probability, by J. M. Keynes, this article inquires about its relevance in the history of the concept of probability. After reviewing the emergence and evolution of the modern concept of probability until the beginning of the 20th century, a nodal point is identified in the publication of J. Bernoulli’s Ars Conjectandi at the beginning of the 18th century, where it was proposed for the first time to treat the entire field of probable conjectures through the mathematical tools of the doctrine of possibilities. This article seeks to understand the Treatise as a reaction to this project embodied in the 18th century by the Laplacian classical school and in the 19th century by the Frequentist school. After presenting Keynes’s main arguments against the conception of probability as a necessarily measurable entity and therefore treatable through the mathematical tools of the doctrine of possibilities, reflections are drawn on the relevance and topicality of the Treatise.

References

  1. Arnauld, A. y Nicole, P. (1662). Logic, or The Art of Thinking: Being The Port-Royal Logic. T. S. Baynes (trad.). Murray and Gibb.
  2. Baccini, A. (2004). High Pressure and Black Clouds: Keynes and the Frequentist Theory of Probability. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 28(5), 653-666. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/beh030.
  3. Bateman, B. W. (1996). Keynes’s Uncertain Revolution. University of Michigan Press.
  4. Bernoulli, J. (1966). Part IV: The Art of Conjecturing. B. Sung (trad.). Harvard University Press.
  5. Bernoulli, J. (2005). On the Law of Large Numbers. The Art of Conjecturing; Part Four showing The Use and Application of the Previous Doctrine to Civil, Moral and Economic Affairs. O. Sheynin (trad.). Sheynin.de. URL: http://www.sheynin.de/download/bernoulli.pdf.
  6. Bookstaber, R. y Langsam, J. (1985). On the Optimality of Coarse Behavior Rules. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 116(2), 161-193.
  7. Brighton, H. y Gigerenzer, G. (2012). How Heuristics Handle Uncertainty. En P. M. Todd y G. Gigerenzer (eds.), Ecological Rationality: Intelligence in the World. (pp. 33-60). Oxford University Press.
  8. Brown, R. (1987). History Versus Hacking on Probability. History of European Ideas, 8(6), 655-673. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-6599(87)90163-X.
  9. Carabelli, A. M. (1988). On Keynes’s Method. Palgrave Macmillan.
  10. Coumet, E. (2000). La teoría del azar, ¿nació por azar? Empiria. Revista de Metodología de Ciencias Sociales, 3, 209-241.
  11. Cournot, A. A. (1843). Exposition de la théorie des chances et des probabilités. L. Hachette.
  12. Daston, L. (1995). Classical Probability in the Enlightenment. Princeton University Press.
  13. Davidson, P. (2009). Great Thinkers in Economics. John Maynard Keynes. Palgrave Macmillan.
  14. De Finetti, B. (1972). Probability, Induction, and Statistics. John Wiley & Sons.
  15. De Moivre, A. (1756). Doctrine Of Chances: or, A Method of Calculating the Probabilities of Events in Play. Chlesea Publishing Company.
  16. Dequech, D. (1997). Uncertainty in a Strong Sense: Meaning and Sources. Economic Issues, 2, 21-44.
  17. Dequech, D. (2011). Uncertainty: A Typology and Refinements of Existing Concepts. Journal of Economic Issues, 45(3), 621-640.
  18. Gillies, D. (2000). Philosophical Theories of Probability. Psychology Press.
  19. Hacking, I. (2006). The Emergence of Probability: A Philosophical Study of Early Ideas About Probability, Induction, and Statistical Inference. Cambridge University Press.
  20. Huygens, C. (1714). De ratiocinis in ludo aleae, or The value of all chances. S. Keimer.
  21. Kendall, M. G. (1956). Studies in the History of Probability and Statistics. II. The Beginnings of a Probability Calculus. Biometrika, 43(1), 1-14.
  22. Keynes, J. M. (1921). A Treatise on Probability. Macmillan and Company.
  23. Keynes, J. M. (2003). Teoría general de la ocupación, el interés y el dinero. R. Hornedo (trad.). Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  24. Landro, A. (2010). Acerca de la probabilidad. Parte I: La interpretación del concepto de azar y la definición de probabilidad. Ediciones Cooperativas.
  25. Landro, A. (2014). El concepto de probabilidad en la obra de Lord Keynes. Revista de Investigación en Modelos Matemáticos aplicados a la Gestión y la Economía, 1(1), 139-153. URL: http://www.economicas.uba.ar/wpcontent/uploads/2016/04/8-El-concepto-de-probabilidad-en-la-obrade-Lord-Keynes.-Alberto-H.-Landro.pdf.
  26. Landro, A. y González, M. (2016). Acerca del problema de Bernoulli y la determinación del verdadero valor de una probabilidad. Ediciones Cooperativas.
  27. Laplace, P. S. (1902). A Philosophical Essay on Probabilities. F. W. Truscott y F. L. Emory (trads.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
  28. Locke, J. (1999). Ensayo sobre el entendimiento humano. E. O´Gorman (trad.). Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  29. Maistrov, L. E. (1974). Probability Theory: A Historical Sketch. Academic Press.
  30. McCann, C. R. (1994). Probability Foundations of Economic Theory. Routledge.
  31. Mill, J. S. (1882). A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive. Harper & Brothers.
  32. O’Donnell, R. (1989). Keynes: Philosophy, Economics and Politics: The Philosophical Foundations of Keynes’s Thought and Their Influence on His Economics and Politics. Palgrave Macmillan.
  33. O’Donnell, R. (1991). Keynes on Probability, Expectations and Uncertainty. En Keynes as Philosopher-Economist. (pp. 3-60). Springer.
  34. Owen, D. (2007). Locke on Judgement. En L. Newman (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Locke´'s “Essay Concerning Human Understanding”. (pp. 406-435). Cambridge University Press.
  35. Porter, T. M. (1986). The Rise of Statistical Thinking. 1820-1900. Princeton University Press.
  36. Ramsey, F. P. (1931). Truth and Probability. En R. B. Braithwaite (ed.), The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays. (pp. 156-198). Harcourt, Brace and Company.
  37. Runde, J. (1990). Keynesian Uncertainty and the Weight of Arguments. Economics and Philosophy, 6(02), 275-292.
  38. Runde, J. (1994). Keynes After Ramsey: In Defence of A Treatise on Probability. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 25(1), 97-121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-3681(94)90022-1.
  39. Savage, L. (1972). The Foundations of Statistics. Dover.
  40. Schüssler, R. (2016). Probability in Medieval and Renaissance Philosophy. En E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/probabilitymedieval-renaissance/
  41. Shackle, G. L. S. (1970). Expectation Enterprise and Profit. The Theory of the Firm. Routledge.
  42. Shackle, G. L. S. (1976). Epistémica y economía: crítica de las doctrinas económicas. F.
  43. González Aramburo (trad.). Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  44. Stigler, S. M. (1986). The History of Statistics: The Measurement of Uncertainty Before 1900. Harvard University Press.
  45. Todhunter, I. (1865). A History of the Mathematical Theory of Probability from the Time of Pascal To That of Laplace. Macmillan and Company.
  46. Venn, J. (1876). The Logic of Chance: An Essay on the Foundations and Province of the Theory of Probability. Macmillan and Company.
  47. Von Mises, R. (1957). Probability, Statistics, and Truth. Dover.