Publicado 2024-04-04
Palavras-chave
Como Citar
Direitos de Autor (c) 2024 Tópicos, Revista de Filosofía
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0.
Downloads
Altmetrics
Citas
Resumo
In this paper, I examine Aristotle’s position on the theory of the soul as a self-moving entity in the light of a less negative conception of his discussion with his predecessors. For this purpose, I discuss the hypothesis according to which Aristotle is producing the concepts necessary for his own research through a critique of Plato’s claims. I show that, more than a criticism, what we are witnessing is a process of conceptual appropriation where Aristotle filters an opinion to make a better use of it. I support my argument by showing how Aristotle’s exegetical device works and how it could be connected to his own definitional procedures in De Anima’s book II.
Referências
- Aristotle. (1907). De Anima. R. D. Hicks (trans.). Cambridge University Press.
- Aristotle. (1953) Metaphysica. D. Ross (ed.). Clarendon Press.
- Aristotle. (1966). De l’âme. A. Jannone & E. Barbotin (trans.). Les Belles Lettres.
- Aristotle. (1967a). De Anima. D. Ross (ed.). Clarendon Press.
- Aristotle. (1967b). Topiques. Livres I-IV. J. Brunschwig (trans.). Les Belles Lettres.
- Aristotle. (1968). De Anima. Books II and III (with Passages from Book I). D. W. Hamlyn (trans.). Clarendon Press.
- Aristotle. (1988). Acerca del alma. T. Calvo (trans.). Gredos.
- Aristotle. (1991). On the Soul. In The Complete Works of Aristotle. (pp. 1-64). J. Barnes (ed.). J. A. Smith (trans.). Princeton University Press.
- Aristotle. (1993). De l’âme. R. Bodéüs (trans.). Flammarion.
- Aristotle. (2010). Acerca del alma. M. Boeri (trans.). Colihue.
- Aristotle. (2016). De Anima. C. Shields (trans.). Clarendon Press.
- Aristotle. (2017). Über die Seele – De Anima. K. Corcilius (trans.). Feliz Meiner.
- Aristotle. (2021). Rhétorique. Livre I. M. Dufour (trans.). Les Belles Lettres.
- Baltussen, H. (1996). A ‘Dialectical’ Argument in De Anima A 4: On Aristotle’s Use of Topoi in Systematic Contexts. In K. Algra, P. van der Horst, & K. Runia (eds.), Polyhistor: Studies in the History and Historiography of Ancient Philosophy. (pp. 333-343). Brill.
- Boeri, M. (2010). Introducción. In Aristotle, Acerca del alma. (pp. xiii-ccxxxiv). Colihue.
- Boeri, M. (2018). Plato and Aristotle on What Is Common to Soul and Body. Some Remarks on a Complicated Issue. In M. Boeri, Y. Y. Kanayama, & J. Mittelmann (eds.), Soul and Mind in Greek Thought: Psychological Issues in Plato and Aristotle. (pp. 153-176). Springer.
- Bolton, R. (1994). The Epistemological Basis of Aristotelian Dialectic. In M. Sim (ed.), From Puzzles to Principles: Essays on Aristotle’s Dialectic. (pp. 57-106). Lexington Books.
- Carter, J. (2018). Does the Soul Weave? Reconsidering De Anima I.4, 408a29-b18. Phronesis 63(1), 25-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15685284-12341341.
- Carter, J. (2019). Aristotle on Earlier Greek Psychology: The Science of Soul. Cambridge University Press.
- Cherniss, H. (1935). Aristotle’s Criticism of Presocratic Philosophy. The John Hopkins Press.
- Cherniss, H. (1944). Aristotle’s Criticism of Plato and the Academy. I. The John Hopkins Press.
- King, C. G. (2021). Δόξαι and the Tools of Dialectic in De Anima I.1-3. In P. Gregoric & J. Fink (eds.), Encounters with Aristotelian Philosophy of Mind. (pp. 15-42). Routledge
- Menn, S. (2002). Aristotle’s Definition of Soul and the Program of the De Anima. In D. Sedley (ed.), Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy. Volume XXII. (pp. 83-129). Oxford University Press.
- Plato. (1901). Opera. II. Tetralogias III-IV. J. Burnet (ed.). Clarendon Press.
- Plato. (1997a). Complete Works. J. Cooper (ed.). Hackett.
- Plato. (1997b). Phaedrus. In Plato, Complete Works. (pp. 506-556). J. Cooper (ed.). A. Nehamas & P. Woodruff (trans.). Hackett.
- Polansky, R. (2007). Aristotle’s De Anima. Cambridge University Press.
- Rapp, C. (2018). Aporia and Dialectical Method in Aristotle. In G. Karamanolis & V. Politis (eds.), The Aporetic Tradition in Ancient Philosophy. (pp. 112-136). Cambridge University Press.
- Sánchez Castro, L. C. (2016). Traditio Animae: la recepción aristotélica de las teorías presocráticas del alma. Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
- Viano, C. (1996). La doxographie du De Anima (I, 2-5) ou le contre-modèle de l’âme. In C. Viano, Corps et âme. Études sur le De Anima. (pp. 51-80). Vrin.
- Witt, C. (1992). Dialectic, Motion, and Perception: De Anima, Book I. In M. Nussbaum & A. Oksenberg (eds.), Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima. (pp. 169-183). Clarendon Press.