Núm. 73 (2025): Septiembre-diciembre
Artículos

La metáfora de la división del trabajo en las teorías de Milne-Edwards y Spencer

PDF
  • Daniel Labrador-Montero
Daniel Labrador-Montero
Universidad de Salamanca
Biografía

Publicado 2025-08-22

Palabras clave

  • Milne-Edwards,
  • Spencer,
  • Adam Smith,
  • división del trabajo,
  • metáfora,
  • biología,
  • economía política,
  • ciencias sociales,
  • darwinismo,
  • ciencias de la vida
    • ...Más
    Menos

Derechos de autor 2025 Tópicos, Revista de Filosofía

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.

Cómo citar

Labrador-Montero, D. (2025). La metáfora de la división del trabajo en las teorías de Milne-Edwards y Spencer. Tópicos, Revista De Filosofía, 73, 253-293. https://doi.org/10.21555/top.v730.3003
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Resumen

En las últimas décadas, numerosos autores han reivindicado la importancia de la metáfora a nivel cognitivo y científico. En esta línea, este artículo realiza un análisis histórico y filosófico de la metáfora de la división del trabajo en las teorías de Henri Milne-Edwards y Herbert Spencer. Si bien es cierto que las relaciones metafóricas entre la biología y las ciencias sociales han suscitado interés filosófico e historiográfico, por lo general, la reflexión se ha enfocado en la transferencia metafórica de conceptos biológicos al pensamiento social y económico-político. En cambio, este artículo apoya la hipótesis de que la influencia fue recíproca; explora cómo un concepto intrínseco a la economía política (la división del trabajo) se convirtió, a lo largo del siglo XIX, en una metáfora prolífica para las ciencias biológicas. A diferencia de investigaciones anteriores que evaluaron principalmente cómo la economía clásica y liberal influyó en la teoría darwiniana, este artículo observa cómo el concepto político-económico de la división del trabajo jugó un papel significativo en las ciencias de la vida del siglo XIX.

PDF

Referencias

  1. Ackerknecht, E. H. (1953). Rudolf Virchow: Doctor, Statesman, Anthropologist. University of Wisconsin Press. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000441-195402000-00042
  2. Appel, T. A. (1987). The Cuvier-Geoffroy Debate: French Biology in the Decades Before Darwin. Oxford University Press.
  3. Balan, B. (1975). Premières recherches sur l’origine et la formation du concept d’économie animale. Revue d’Histoire des Sciences, 28(4), 289-326. https://doi.org/10.3406/rhs.1975.1179
  4. Bernard, C. (1885). Leçons sur les phénomènes de la vie, communs aux animaux et aux végétaux. J.-B. Baillière et fils.
  5. Black, M. (1954-1955). Metaphor. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 55, 273-294. https://doi.org/10.1093/aristotelian/55.1.273
  6. Black, M. (1966). Modelos y metáforas. V. Sánchez de Zabala (trad.). Tecnos.
  7. Boyd, R. (1993). Metaphor and Theory Change: What is “Metaphor” a Metaphor for? En A. Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and Thought (pp. 481-532). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.023
  8. Bucchi, S. (2013). Storie di vittoriani eminenti: evoluzionismo e autobiografia in Darwin e Spencer. Rivista di Storia della Filosofía, 68(4), 2013, 699-720. https://doi.org/10.3280/SF2013-004003
  9. Caponi, G. (2004). Georges Cuvier ¿un nombre olvidado en la historia de la fisiología? Asclepio, 56(1), 169-207. https://doi.org/10.3989/asclepio.2004.v56.i1.76
  10. Caponi, G. (2014). Herbert Spencer: Entre Darwin y Cuvier. Cientiæ Studia, 12(1), 45-71. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-31662014000100003
  11. Cohen, B. (1994). The Natural Sciences and the Social Sciences: Some Critical and Historical Perspectives. Springer.
  12. Darwin, C. R. (1838-1839). Notebook E [Transmutation of species (1838-1839); CUL-DAR124]. Darwin Online. https://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?itemID=CUL-DAR124.-&viewtype=side&pageseq=1
  13. Darwin, C. R. (1851). A Monograph of the Sub-Class Cirripedia, with Figures of All the Species: The Lepadidæ; or, Pedunculated Cirripedes. I. The Ray Society. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.2104
  14. Darwin, C. R. (1854a). A Monograph of the Sub-Class Cirripedia, with Figures of all the Species: The Balanidæ, (or Sessile Cirripedes); the Verrucidæ, etc. etc. etc. II. The Ray Society.
  15. Darwin, C. R. (1854b). Letter no. 1573. [Letter to Joseph D. Hooker]. Darwin Correspondence Project. https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/DCP-LETT-1573.xml
  16. Darwin, C. R. (1857). Letter no. 2136. [Letter to Asa Gray]. Darwin Correspondence Project. https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/DCP-LETT-2136.xml
  17. Darwin, C. R. (1859). On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. John Murray. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.68064
  18. Darwin, C. R. (1975). Natural Selection: Being the Second Part of His Big Species Book Written from 1856 to 1858. R. C. Stauffer (ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  19. Davidson, D. (1978). What Metaphors Mean. Critical Inquiry, 5(1), 31-48. https://doi.org/10.1086/447971
  20. D’Hombres, E. (2012). The “Division of Physiological Labour:” The Birth, Life and Death of a Concept. Journal of the History of Biology, 45(1), 3-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-010-9256-2
  21. D’Hombres, E. (2015). The Darwinian Muddle on the Division of Labour: An Attempt at Clarification. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 38, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-015-0090-x
  22. Elwick, J. (2003). Herbert Spencer and the Disunity of the Social Organism. History of Science, 41(1), 35-72. https://doi.org/10.1177/007327530304100102
  23. Elwick, J. (2015). Containing Multitudes. Herbert Spencer, Organisms Social and Orders of Individuality. En M. Francis y M. W. Taylor (eds.), Herbert Spencer. Legacies (pp. 89-110). Routledge.
  24. Fox Keller, E. (1995). Refiguring Life: Metaphors of Twentieth-Century Biology. Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/kell92562
  25. Gilson, É. (1980). De Aristóteles a Darwin (y vuelta). Ensayo sobre algunas constantes de la biofilosofía. A. Clavería (trad.). EUNSA.
  26. Goschler, C. (2002). Rudolf Virchow: Mediziner—Anthropologe—Politiker. Böhlau Verlag.
  27. Groenewegen, P. D. (1977). Adam Smith and the Division of Labour: A Bicentenary Estimate. Australian Economic Papers, 16(29), 161-174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8454.1977.tb00597.x
  28. Harré, R. (1960). Metaphor, Model and Mechanism. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 60(1), 101-122. https://doi.org/10.1093/aristotelian/60.1.101
  29. Hearn, J. (2018). How to Read “The Wealth of Nations” (or Why the Division of Labor Is More Important Than Competition in Adam Smith). Sociological Theory, 36(2), 162-184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275118777010
  30. Hesse, M. (1970). Models and Analogies in Sciences. University of Notre Dame Press.
  31. Hesse, M. (1988). The Cognitive Claims of Metaphor. The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 2(1), 1-16.
  32. Johach, E. (2008). Krebszelle und Zellenstaat: zur medizinsichen und politischen Metaphorik in Rudolf Virchows Zellularpathologie. Rombach Verlag KG.
  33. Labrador-Montero, D. (2022). Darwin y la metáfora en ciencia. La retroalimentación conceptual entre la economía política y la historia natural británicas en los siglos XVIII y XIX [Tesis doctoral, Universidad de Salamanca]. Repositorio Gredos USAL. https://gredos.usal.es/bitstream/handle/10366/151006/PDLFC_LabradorMonteroD_Darwin.pdf?isAllowed=y&sequence=1
  34. La Vergata, A. (1994). Herbert Spencer: Biology, Sociology, and Cosmic Evolution. En S. Maasen, E. Mendelsohn y P. Weingart (eds.), Biology as Society, Society as Biology: Metaphors (pp. 193-230). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0673-3_9
  35. Lakoff, G. y Johnson, M. (1991). Metáforas de la vida cotidiana. C. González Marín (trad.). Cátedra.
  36. Limoges, C. (1994). Milne-Edwards, Darwin, Durkheim and the Division of Labour: A Case Study in Reciprocal Conceptual Exchanges Between the Social and the Natural Sciences. En I. B. Cohen (ed.), The Natural Sciences and the Social Sciences (pp. 317-343). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3391-5_10
  37. López Lloret, J. (2021). Adam Smith y la hipótesis del desarrollo. Teorema, 40(3), 101-119.
  38. Maasen, S., Mendelsohn, E. y Weingart, P. (1994). Biology as Society, Society as Biology: Metaphors. Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0673-3
  39. Marcos, A. (1995). Biología, realismo y metáfora. Ágora. Papeles de Filosofía, 14(1), 77-97.
  40. Mazzolini, R. G. (1988). Politisch-biologische Analogien im Frühwerk Rudolf Virchows. Basislken- Presse.
  41. Milne-Edwards, H. (1827a). Nerfs. En Dictionnarie classique d’histoire naturelle, tome onzième (pp. 529-534). Rey et Gravier.
  42. Milne-Edwards, H. (1827b). Organisation. En Dictionnarie classique d’histoire naturelle, tome douzième (pp. 332-34). Rey et Gravier.
  43. Milne-Edwards, H. (1834). Histoire naturelle des crustacés. Roret.
  44. Milne-Edwards, H. (1841). Élémens de zoologie. Adolphe Wahlen et Compagnie.
  45. Milne-Edwards, H. (1851). Introduction à la zoologie générale. Chez Victor Masson. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.50092
  46. Milne-Edwards, H. (1868). Recherches pour servir à l’histoire naturelle des mammifères. I. G. Masson.
  47. Mitchell, S. (1994). The Superorganism Metaphor: Then and Now. En S. Maasen, E. Mendelsohn y P. Weingart (eds.), Biology as Society, Society as Biology: Metaphors (pp. 231-248). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0673-3_10
  48. Offer, J. (2014). From ‘Natural Selection’ to ‘Survival of the Fittest’: On the Significance of Spencer’s Refashioning of Darwin in the 1860s. Journal of Classical Sociology, 14(2), 156-177. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X13491646
  49. Otis, L. (1999). Membranes: Metaphors of Invasion in Nineteenth-Century Literature, Science, and Politics. Johns Hopkins University Press.
  50. Polo-Blanco, J. (2016). Economía y biología. La decisiva influencia del naturalismo en la construcción teórica de la Economía Política. Daimon. Revista Internacional de Filosofía, 69, 93-108. https://doi.org/10.6018/daimon/218841
  51. Reynolds, A. S. (2018). The Third Lens Metaphor and the Creation of Modern Cell Biology. The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226563435.001.0001
  52. Richards, I. A. (1965). The Philosophy of Rhetoric. Oxford University Press.
  53. Richards, R. J. (1992). The Meaning of Evolution: The Morphological Construction and Ideological Reconstruction of Darwin’s Theory. The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226712055.001.0001
  54. Robin, C. (1873). Anatomie et physiologie cellulaires. Baillière.
  55. Rorty, R. (1987). Unfamiliar Noises, Hesse and Davidson on Metaphor. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Supplementary Volumes), 61, 283-296. https://doi.org/10.1093/aristoteliansupp/61.1.283
  56. Ruse, M. (2000). Metaphor in Evolutionary Biology. Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 54(214), 593-619.
  57. Ruse, M. (2009). Monad to Man: The Concept of Progress in Evolutionary Biology. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1kz4gtk
  58. Sahlins, M. (1976). The Use and Abuse of Biology: An Anthropological Critique of Sociobiology. The University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.20259
  59. Sánchez, J.-E. (1992). Comentarios á división espacial do traballo e da producción. Minius, 1, 9-25.
  60. Schumpeter, J. A. (2006). History of Economic Analysis. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203983911
  61. Schweber, S. S. (1980). Darwin and the Political Economist: Divergence of Character. Journal of the History of Biology, 13(2), 195-289. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00125744
  62. Schweber, S. S. (1985). The Wider British Context in Darwin’s Theorizing. En D. Kohn (ed.), The Darwinian Heritage (pp. 35-70). Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400854714.35
  63. Searle, J. R. (1993). Metaphor. En A. Ortony (ed.). Metaphor and Thought (pp. 83-111). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.008
  64. Secord, J. A. (2021). Revolutions in the Head: Darwin, Malthus and Robert M. Young. The British Journal for the History of Science, 54(1), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007087420000631
  65. Smith, A. (1904). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Edwin Cannan.
  66. Sontag, S. (2007). La enfermedad y sus metáforas. M. Muchnik (trad.). Taurus.
  67. Spencer, H. (1851). Social Statics: or, The Conditions Essential to Human Happines. John Chapman.
  68. Spencer, H. (1852). A Theory of Population, Deduced from the General Law of Animal Fertility. John Chapman.
  69. Spencer, H. (1864). The Principles of Biology. I. D. Appleton and Company.
  70. Spencer, H. (1867). First Principles. Williams and Norgate.
  71. Spencer, H. (1873). The Study of Sociology. Henry S. King & Co.
  72. Spencer, H. (1884). The Principles of Biology. II. D. Appleton and Company.
  73. Spencer, H. (1891a). Progress: Its Law and Cause. En H. Spencer, Essays: Scientific, Political, and Speculative. I (pp. 8-62). Williams and Norgate. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003191827-2
  74. Spencer, H. (1891b). Specialized Administration. En H. Spencer, Essays: Scientific, Political, and Speculative. III (pp. 401-444). Williams and Norgate. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003191841-13
  75. Spencer, H. (1891c). The Social Organism. En H. Spencer, Essays: Scientific, Political, and Speculative. I (pp. 265-307). Williams and Norgate. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003191827-8
  76. Spencer, H. (1981). The Man Versus the State: With Six Essays on Government, Society, and Freedom. Liberty Classics.
  77. Todes, D. P. (1989). Darwin without Malthus: The Struggle for Existence in Russian Evolutionary Thought. Oxford University Press.
  78. Wallace, A. R. (1858). On the Tendency of Varieties to Depart Indefinitely from the Original Type. Journal of the Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London (Zoology), 3, 53-65.
  79. Young, R. M. (1969). Malthus and the Evolutionists: The Common Context of Biological and Social Theory. Past & Present, 43, 109-145. https://doi.org/10.1093/past/43.1.109
  80. Young, R. M. (1971). Darwin’s Metaphor: Does Nature Select? The Monist, 55(3), 442-503. https://doi.org/10.5840/monist197155322
  81. Young, R. M. (1990). Darwinism and the División of Labour. Science as Culture, 1(9), 110-124. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505439009526283