No. 64 (2022): Septiembre-diciembre
Articles

The Desperate and Failed Repetition. A Comparison of Kierkegaard’s Repetition and Goethe’s The Sorrows of Young Werther

Luis Guerrero Martínez
Universidad Iberoamericana. Departamento de Filosofía

Published 2022-08-13

How to Cite

Guerrero Martínez, L. (2022). The Desperate and Failed Repetition. A Comparison of Kierkegaard’s Repetition and Goethe’s The Sorrows of Young Werther. Tópicos, Revista De Filosofía, (64), 385–416. https://doi.org/10.21555/top.v640.2008

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Altmetrics

Citas

Abstract

One of the most complex and, at the same time, most important philosophical categories in Kierkegaard’s thought is that of “repetition”. To this notion Kierkegaard devotes one of his first pseudonymous works, namely, Repetition, by Constantin Constantius. This paper, firstly, explores the concept of “desperate and failed repetition” that plays an important role in Kierkegaardian irony. Secondly, it shows some parallel aspects found in Repetition and in Goethe’s novel, The Sorrows of Young Werther; this connection allows for a better understanding of both works regarding despair linked to a failed repetition.

References

  1. Fuentes primaris
  2. Goethe, J. W. (1951). Goethes Werke in Zwei Bänden. Die Berland-Buch-Klassiker.
  3. Goethe, J. W. ((1972). Fausto. J. Roviralta Borrell (trad.). W. M. Jackson.
  4. Goethe, J. W. ((1982). Werther. J. Valor (trad.). Salvat Editores.
  5. Goethe, J. W. ((2009). Obras completas. Tomo II. R. Cansinos Asséns (trad.). Aguilar.
  6. Kierkegaard, S. (1997-2013). (SKS). Kierkegaards Skrifter. 55 Volúmenes. N. Jørgen Cappelørn, J. Garff, J. Kondrup, A. McKinnon y F. Hauberg Mortensen (eds.). Søren Kierkegaard Forskningscenteret ved Københavns Universitet-Gad.
  7. Kierkegaard, S. (2006). O lo uno o lo otro. Un fragmento de vida. I. B. Saez Tajafuerce y D. Gonzalez (trads.). Trotta.
  8. Kierkegaard, S. (2007). El concepto de la angustia. D. Gutiérrez Rivero (trad.). Alianza.
  9. Kierkegaard, S. (2008). Postscriptum no científico y definitivo a Migajas filosóficas. N. Bravo Jordán (trad.). Universidad Iberoamericana.
  10. Kierkegaard, S. (2009). La repetición. D. Gutiérrez Rivero (trad.). Alianza.
  11. Kierkegaard, S. (2017). Diarios. Volumen V. 1842-1844. N. Bravo Jordán (trad.). Universidad Iberoamericana.
  12. Fuentes secundarias
  13. Binetti, M. J. (2008). Mediación o repetición: de Hegel a Kierkegaard y Deleuze. Δαíμων. Revista de Filosofía, 45, 125-139.
  14. Burgess, A. J. (1993). Repetition–A Story of Suffering. En R. L. Perkins (ed.), Fear and Trembling and Repetition. (pp. 247-262). International Kierkegaard Commentary. Mercer University Press.
  15. Carlisle, C. (2005). Kierkegaard’s Philosophy of Becoming. Movements and Positions. State University of New York Press.
  16. Dobre, C. (2014). Søren Kierkegaard y la reconstrucción de la filosofía mediante la duda subjetiva y la repetición a partir del escrito De omnibus dubitandum est. Tópicos, Revista de Filosofía, 47, pp. 25-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21555/top.v0i47.661.
  17. Edmunds, K. (1996). “Der Gesang soll deinen Namen erhalten”: Ossian, Werther and Texts of/for Mourning. Goethe Yearbook, 8, 45-65.
  18. Garff, J. (2005). Søren Kierkegaard. A Biography. B. H. Kirmmse (trad.). Princeton University Press.
  19. Gouwens, D. J. (1993). Understanding, Imagination, and Irony in Kierkegaard’s Repetition. En R. L. Perkins (ed.), Fear and Trembling and Repetition. (pp. 283-308). International Kierkegaard Commentary. Mercer University Press.
  20. Guedes Rossatti, G. (2015). Constantin Constantius: The Activity of a Travelling Esthetician and How He Still Happened to Pay for the Dinner. En J. Stewart y K. Nun (eds.), Kierkegaard’s Pseudonyms. (pp. 51-66). Ashgate.
  21. Heiberg, J. L. (1844). Det astronomiske Aar. Urania. Aarbog for 1844, 77-160.
  22. Hong, H. V. y Hong, E. H. (1983). Historical Introduction. En S. Kierkegaard, Fear and Trembling. Repetition. (pp. IX-XXXIX). Princeton University Press.
  23. Horacio. (1847). Odas. J. Escriche (trad.). Imprenta de Alejandro Gómez Fuentenebro.
  24. Mooney, E. F. (2017). On Søren Kierkegaard: Dialogue, Polemics, Lost Intimacy, and Time. Routledge.
  25. Muenzer, C. S. (1984). Figures of Identity: Goethe’s Novels and the Enigmatic Self. Penn State University Press.
  26. Platón. (1999). Diálogos. II. Gorgias, Menéxeno, Eutidemo, Menón, Crátilo. J. Calonge Ruiz, E. Acosta Méndez, F. J. Olivieri, J. L. Calvo (trads.). Gredos.
  27. Poole, R. (1993). Kierkegaard: The Indirect Communication. University of Virginia Press.
  28. Stewart, J. (2015). The Cultural Crisis of the Danish Golden Age. Heiberg, Martensen and Kierkegaard. Museum Tusculanum Press.
  29. Stewart, J. y Nun, K. (2008). Goethe: A German Classic Through the Filter of the Danish Golden Age. En J. Stewart (ed.), Kierkegaard and his German Contemporaries: Literature and Aesthetics. (pp. 51-96). Ashgate.
  30. Sullivan, H. I. (2007). The Dangerous Quest for Nature Narratives in Goethe’s Werther: A Reading of the Ruptured Monologue and the Ruptured Body. Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and the Environment, 14(2), 1-23.
  31. Valadez, L. (2018). Samsagaz Gamgy. Una lectura de El señor de los anillos desde la repetición kierkegaardiana. Estudios Kierkegaardianos. Revista de Filosofía, 4, 115-146.