No. 63 (2022): Mayo-agosto
Articles

Individuality and Consciousness in Plotinus

María Jesús Hermoso Félix
Universidad de Valladolid

Published 2022-04-18

How to Cite

Hermoso Félix, M. J. (2022). Individuality and Consciousness in Plotinus. Tópicos, Revista De Filosofía, (63), 303–332. https://doi.org/10.21555/top.v63i0.1961

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Altmetrics

Citas

Abstract

The notion of “individuality” in Plotinus is one of the most discussed. Throughout the Enneads, the problem of the individual subject arises from the complexity in understanding the relation between man and soul. To the intelligible man, also known as the inner or first man, a second man is added, so that “we have come to be the pair of them” (En. VI 4 (22) 14.28-30). This question has been extensively addressed from different angles that lead either to a purely structuralist solution, or to its criticism and the search for a more stable definition of subjective identity. The thesis that we will defend in this article, and that will indicate our position in the debate, tries to give a new perspective of the issue alluding to the sphere of life and its forms. The continuity between the different men will be determined by the continuity between their different forms of life, a primary issue to which the problem of individuality and the different modes of consciousness are subject.

References

  1. Bibliografía
  2. Fuentes
  3. Aristóteles. (1831-1870). Opera. I-V. E. Bekker (ed.). Academia Regia Borussica.
  4. Aristóteles. (1924). Methaphysics. D. W. Ross (trad.). Clarendon Press.
  5. Aristóteles. (1961). De Anima. D. W. Ross (trad.). Cambridge University Press.
  6. Aristóteles. (1968). De Animal. Books II and III. D. W. Hamlyn (trad.). Clarendon Press.
  7. Aristóteles. (1988). Acerca del alma. T. Calvo (trad.). Gredos.
  8. Aristóteles. (1994). Metafísica. T. Calvo (trad.). Gredos.
  9. Platón. (1961). Opera. I-V. J. Burnet (ed.). Clarendon Press.
  10. Platón. (1992a). Sofista. En Diálogos. V. (pp. 331-482). N. L. Cordero (trad.). Gredos.
  11. Platón. (1992b). Timeo. En Diálogos. VI. (pp. 155-261). F. Lisi (trad.). Gredos.
  12. Plotino. (1924). Ennéades. Siete volúmenes. E. Bréhier (ed. y trad.). Les Belles Lettres.
  13. Plotino. (1951-1973). Opera. [Editio maior]. Tres volúmenes. Henry P. y H. R. Schwyzer (eds.). Desclée de Brower-E. J. Brill.
  14. Plotino. (1964-1982). Opera. [Editio minor]. Tres volúmenes. Henry P. y H. R. Schwyzer (eds.). Clarendon Press.
  15. Plotino. (1982-1998). Enéadas. I-VI. Tres volúmenes. J. Igal (ed. y trad.). Gredos.
  16. Plotino. (1984). Ennead V. A. H. Armstrong (ed. y trad.). Loeb Classical Library.
  17. Plotino. (2004). Traité 53 (I, 1). G. Aubry (ed. y trad.). Cerf.
  18. Plotino. (2018). The Enneads. L. P. Gerson (ed.). L. P. Gerson, G. Boys-Stones, J. M. Dillon, R. A. H. King, A. Smith y J. Wilberding (trads.). Cambridge University Press.
  19. Estudios
  20. Armstrong, A. M. (1977). Form, Individual and Person in Plotinus. Dionysius, 1, 49-68.
  21. Blumenthal, H. J. (1966). Did Plotinus Believe in Ideas of Individuals? Phronesis, 11(1), 61-80.
  22. Blumenthal, H. J. (1971). Plotinus’ Psychology. Martinus Nijhoff.
  23. Aubry, G. (2008). Individuation, particularization et determination selon Plotin. Phronesis, 53, 271-289.
  24. Bréhier, E. (1928). La philosophie de Plotin. Vrin.
  25. Chiaradonna, R. (2014). Plotinus on Sensible Particulars and Individual Essences. En A. Torrance y J. Zachhuber (eds.), Individuality in Late Antiquity (pp. 46-61). Ashgate.
  26. Emilsson, E. K. (1988). Plotinus on Sense-Perception. Cambridge University Press.
  27. Fronterotta, F. (2011). De quoi il n’y a certainement pas de forms? Une question platonicienne et ses réponses chez Alcinoos et Plotin. Études platoniciennes, 8, 43-52.
  28. García Bazán, F. (1981). Plotino y la gnosis. Fundación para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura.
  29. Girard, C. (2013). L’identité ontologique du nous (ἠμεῑς) chez Plotin. Études platoniciennes, 10, 1-27.
  30. Goldschmidt, V. (1953). Le système stoïcien et l’idée de temps. Vrin.
  31. Hadot, P. (1960). Être, vie, pensée chez Plotin et avant Plotin. En E. R. Dodds, W. Theiler, P. Hadot, H.-C. Puech, H., Dörrie, V. Cilento, R. Harder, H. R. Schwyzer, A. H. Armstrong y P. Henry, Les sources de Plotin. (pp. 107-157). Fondation Hardt.
  32. Hadot, P. (1980). Niveaux de conscience dans la mystique de Plotin. Journal de Psychologie, 2-3, 243-266.
  33. Hadot, P. (1997). Plotin ou la simplicité du regard. Gallimard.
  34. Henry, P. (1960). Une comparaison chez Aristote, Alexandre et Plotin. En E. R. Dodds, W. Theiler, P. Hadot, H.-C. Puech, H., Dörrie, V. Cilento, R. Harder, H. R. Schwyzer, A. H. Armstrong y P. Henry, Les sources de Plotin. (pp. 427-445). Fondation Hart.
  35. Hermoso Félix, M. J. (2019). La percepción en Plotino: contemplación de solas formas. Anuario Filosófico, 52(3), 1-25.
  36. Hutchinson, D. (2018). Consciousness Terms. En Plotinus on Consciousness. (pp. 40-44). Cambridge University Press.
  37. Kalligas, P. (1997). Forms of Individuals in Plotinus: A Re-Examination. Phronesis, 42(2), 206-227.
  38. Moreau, J. (1970). Plotin ou la gloire de la philosophie antique. Vrin.
  39. Narbonne, J. M. (2011). Plotinus in Dialogue With the Gnostics. Brill.
  40. Remes, P. (2007). Plotinus on the Self. Cambridge University Press.
  41. Rist, J. M. (1970). Ideas of Individuals in Plotinus: A Replay to Dr. Blumenthal. Revue international de philosophie, 24(92), 298-303.
  42. Tornau, C. (2009). Qu’est-ce qu’un individu ? Unité, individualité et conscience de soi dans la métaphysique plotinienne de l’âme. Les études philosophiques, 3(90), 333-361.
  43. Trouillard, J. (1955). La purification plotinienne. PUF.
  44. Trouillard, J. (1975). [Reseña de Plotinus’ Psychology, de H. J. Blumental. Martinus Nijhoff, 1971]. Revue des études grecques, 88(419), 375-376.
  45. Violette, R. (1994). Les formes de la conscience chez Plotin. Revue des études grecques, 107(509-510), 222-237.