No. 62 (2022): January - June
Articles

The Evolution of Moral Judgment. A Plural, Functional Explanation

PDF (Español (España)) XML (Español (España))
  • Víctor Emilio Parra Leal
Víctor Emilio Parra Leal
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
Bio
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21555/top.v62i0.1233

Published 2021-12-11

Keywords

How to Cite

Parra Leal, V. E. (2021). The Evolution of Moral Judgment. A Plural, Functional Explanation. Tópicos, Revista De Filosofía, (62), 315–347. https://doi.org/10.21555/top.v62i0.1233

Copyright (c) 2021 Tópicos, Revista de Filosofía

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Altmetrics

Citas

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

Evolutionary functional theories about morality assume that morality has been evolutionarily selected because it produces a cooperative and pro-social effect (selected effect functional theory, SE). This assumption wrongly implies that the trait which produces the selected effect is fully known. Furthermore, a SE theory does not seem to explain the peculiarities of moral thought, which are mostly synthesized in the features of moral judgment: its authoritative and inescapable character (practical clout). This paper provides an alternative SE explanation and argues that a causal role functional explanation (CR) is also necessary because this kind of explanation establishes the way the selected effect interacts with basic human evaluative propensities, which not only makes it possible to give an account of the practical clout of moral judgment, but of the phenomenon of moral ambivalence as well. However, the connection between reason and emotion
and their influence on morality remains unexplained.

PDF (Español (España)) XML (Español (España))

References

  1. Alexander, R. D. (1987). The Biology of Moral Systems. Aldine de Gruyter.
  2. Amundson, R. y Lauder, G. V. (1994). Function Without Purpose: The Uses of Causal Role Function in Evolutionary Biology. Biology and Philosophy, 9, 443–469.
  3. Asch, S. (1951). Effects of Group Pressure on the Modification and Distortion of Judgements. En H. Guetzkow (ed.), Group, Leadership and Men. (pp. 177–190). Carnegie Press.
  4. Axelrod, R. (1984). The Evolution of Cooperation. Basic Books.
  5. Ayala, F. J. (2010). The Difference of Being Human: Morality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 9015-9022.
  6. Baumeister, R. F. y Leary, M. R. (1995). The Need to Belong: Desire for Interpersonal Attachments as a Fundamental Human Motivation.
  7. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497-529.
  8. Bekoff, M. y Pierce, J. (2009). Wild Justice: The Moral Lives of Animals. University of Chicago Press.
  9. Brosnan, S. F. y De Waal, F. B. M. (2003). Monkeys Reject Unequal Pay. Nature, 425, 297-299.
  10. Camerer, C. F. y Thaler, R. H. (1995). Anomalies: Ultimatums, Dictators and Manners. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(2), 209-219.
  11. Coe, C. L. y Rosenblum, L. A. (1984). Male Dominance in the Bonnet Macaque: A Malleable Relationship. P. R. Barchas y S. P. Mendoza (eds.), Social Cohesion: Essays Toward a Sociophysiological Perspective. (pp. 31–64). Greenwood Press.
  12. Cummins, R. (1975). Functional Analysis. The Journal of Philosophy, 72(20), 741–765.
  13. Cummins, R. y Roth, M. (2010). Traits Have Not Evolved to Function the Way They Do Because of a Past Advantage. En F. J. Ayala y R. Arp (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology. (pp. 72–85). Blackwell.
  14. Davies, P. S. (2009). Conceptual Conservatism: The Case of Normative Functions. En U. Krohs y P. Kroes (eds.), Functions in Biological and Artificial Worlds. (pp. 127–146). MIT Press.
  15. Darwin, C. R. ([1882] 1989). The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. New York University Press.
  16. De Waal F. B. M. (1982). Chimpanzee Politics: Power and Sex Among Apes. Jonathan Cape.
  17. De Waal, F. B. M. (1996). Good Natured: The Origins of Right and Wrong in Humans and Other Animals. Harvard University Press.
  18. De Waal, F. B. M. (2007). Los instintos sociales de los primates, la moralidad humana y el auge y la caída de la “teoría de la capa”. En Primates y filósofos. La evolución de la moral del simio al hombre. (pp. 23-105). Paidós.
  19. Flack, J. C. y De Waal, F. B. M. (2002). ‘Any Animal Whatever’. Darwinian Building Blocks of Morality in Monkeys and Apes. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 7(1-2), 1-29.
  20. Fodor, J. A. (1983). The Modularity of Mind. MIT Press.
  21. Friedman, B. M. (2005). The Moral Consequences of Economic Growth. Vintage Books.
  22. Gausel, N. y Leach, C. (2011). Concern for Self‐Image and Social Image in the Management of Moral Failure: Rethinking Shame. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 468-478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.803.
  23. Gibbard, A. (1990). Wise Choices, Apt Feelings: A Theory of Normative Judgment. Harvard University Press.
  24. Gould, S. J. y Vrba, E. S. (1982). Exaptation—A Missing Term in the Science of Form. Paleobiology, 8(1), 4-15
  25. Greenfield, M. D. (2006). Honesty and Deception in Animal Signals. En J. R. Lucas y L. W. Simmons (eds.), Essays in Animal Behaviour: Celebrating 50 Years of Animal Behaviour. (pp. 281-300). Elsevier Academic Press.
  26. Haidt, J. y Joseph, C. (2004). Intuitive Ethics: How Innately Prepared Intuitions Generate Culturally Variable Virtues. Daedalus, 133(4), 55–66.
  27. Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The Genetical Theory of Social Behaviour. II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7(1), 17-52.
  28. Harms, W. F. y Skyrms, B. (2008). Evolution of Moral Norms. En M. Ruse (ed.), The Oxford Handbook on the Philosophy of Biology. (pp. 434-450). Oxford University Press.
  29. Haun, D. B. M. y Tomasello, M. (2011). Conformity to Peer Pressure in Preschool Children. Child Development, 82(6), 1759–1767. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011. 01666.x.
  30. Huneman, P. (2013). Functions: Selection and Mechanisms. Springer.
  31. Jackson, T. N. W. y Fry, B. G. (2016). A Tricky Trait: Applying the Fruits of the “Function Debate” in the Philosophy of Biology to the “Venom Debate” in the Science of Toxinology. Toxins, 8, 263.
  32. James, H. (2002). The End of Globalization: Lessons from the Great Depression. Harvard University Press.
  33. Jamieson, D. (2002). Is There Progress in Morality? Utilitas, 14(3), 318-338.
  34. Joyce, R. (2006). The Evolution of Morality. MIT Press.
  35. Kitcher, P. (2006). Biology and Ethics. En D. Copp (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory. (pp. 163-186). Oxford University Press.
  36. Krebs, J. R. y Dawkins, R. (1984). Animal Signals: Mind-Reading and Manipulation. En J. R. Krebs y N. B. Davies (ed.), Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach. (pp. 380-402). Blackwell.
  37. Lewis, D. (1969). Convention. A Philosophical Study. Harvard University Press.
  38. Machery, E. y Mallon, R. (2010). Evolution of Morality. En J. M. Doris y The Moral Psychology Research Group (eds.), The Moral Psychology Handbook. (pp. 3–47). Oxford University Press.
  39. Maslow, A. H. (1968). Toward a Psychology of Being. Van Nostrand. Maynard Smith, J. y Harper, D. (2003). Animal Signals. Oxford University Press.
  40. Millikan, R. (1984). Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories: New Foundations for Realism. MIT Press.
  41. Neander, K. (1991). Functions as Selected Effects: The Conceptual Analysts Defense. Philosophy of Science, 58(2), 168–184.
  42. Over, H. (2016). The Origins of Belonging Social Motivation in Infants and Young Children. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 371. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0072.
  43. Peterson, D. (2011). The Moral Lives of Animals. Bloomsbury Press.
  44. Prinz, J. J. (2007). The Emotional Construction of Morals. Oxford University Press.
  45. Prinz, J. J. (2008). Is Morality Innate? En W. Sinnott-Armstrong (ed.), Moral Psychology. Volume 1. The Evolution of Morality: Adaptations and Innateness. (pp. 367-406). MIT Press.
  46. Rizzolatti, G. y Craighero, L. (2004). The Mirror-Neuron System. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169-192.
  47. Rogers, C. (1961). On Becoming a Person. Houghton Mifflin.
  48. Rosas, A. (2005). La moral y sus sombras: la racionalidad instrumental y la evolución de las normas de equidad. Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía, 37(110), 79-104.
  49. Ruse, M. y Wilson, E. O. (1986). Moral Philosophy as Applied Science. Philosophy, 61(236), 173–192.
  50. Sartre, J.-P. (1946). L’esistenzialismo è un umanismo. Les Éditions Nagel.
  51. Schacter, S. (1959). The Psychology of Affiliation. Experimental Studies of the Sources of Gregariousness. Stanford University Press.
  52. Smetana, J. G. y Braeges, J. L. (1990). The Development of Toddlers’ Moral and Conventional Judgments. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 36(3), 329-346.
  53. Sinclair, N. (2012). Metaethics, Teleosemantics and the Function of Moral Judgements. Biology and Philosophy, 27(5), 639–662.
  54. Singer, P. (2011). The Expanding Circle: Ethics, Evolution, and Moral Progress. Princeton University Press.
  55. Slocombe, K. E. y Zuberbühler, K. (2007). Chimpanzees Modify Recruitment Screams as a Function of Audience Composition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(43), 17228–17233.
  56. Street, S. (2006). A Darwinian Dilemma for Realist Theories of Value. Philosophical Studies, 127, 109–166.
  57. Tajfel, H. (1981). Human Groups and Social Categories. Cambridge University Press [(1984). Grupos humanos y categorías sociales. Herder].
  58. Trivers, R. L. (1971). The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 46(1), 35-57.
  59. Von Rohr, C. R., Burkart, J. M. y Van Schaik, C. P. (2011). Evolutionary Precursors of Social Norms in Chimpanzees: A New Approach. Biology and Philosophy, 26, 1–30.
  60. Wong, D. B. (2006). Natural Moralities: A Defense of Pluralistic Relativism. Oxford University Press.
  61. Wright, L. (1973). Functions. The Philosophical Review, 82(2), 139–168.