Published 2024-11-27
Keywords
How to Cite
Downloads
Abstract
Identity is a central element used to define the individual and help them position themselves in relation to others. It is a subjective psychological experience influenced by internal and external factors. In the field of caregiving, the distinction between ‘profession’ and ‘professional’ is significant, with the latter being more inclusive by considering any worker who performs their duties with knowledge and skill, regardless of their qualification level. For professional identity to have its optimal effect on commitment and performance among care professionals, it should be maintained within a moderate range. Since much of caregiving is provided within or through an organization, professional and organizational identities should ideally complement each other. Professional identity encompasses the values, beliefs, skills, and behaviors associated with a specific profession, while organizational identity focuses on the values and beliefs that define and differentiate an organization from others. However, as we tend to identify more easily with groups where we spend more time and work more directly, conflicts between these two identities can arise. Therefore, it is important to establish strategies to align professional and organizational identities. Strengthening organizational identity, facilitating professional identity, and promoting a dual identity are strategies that, when applied simultaneously, contribute to both professional and organizational identification. These strategies allow employees to integrate and balance both identities, reducing conflicts and enhancing their commitment to the organization.
References
- Albert, S., & Whetten D. A. (1985). Organizational identity. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 263–295.
- Ashforth, B. E., Harrison, S. H., & Corley, K.G. (2008). Identification in organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions. Journal of Management, 34(3), 325-374. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316059
- Bunderson, J. S. (2001). How work ideologies shape the psychological contracts of professional employees: Doctors’ responses to perceived breach. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(7), 717-741. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.112
- Caza, B. B., & Creary, S. J. (2016). The construction of professional identity. In A. Wilkinson, D. Hislop, & C. Coupland (Eds.), Perspectives on contemporary professional work (pp. 259-285). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783475582.00022
- Dommer, S. L., & Swaminathan, V. (2013). Explaining the endowment effect through ownership: The role of identity, gender, and self-threat. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(5), 1034-1050. https://doi.org/10.1086/666737
- Dutton, J. E., Roberts, L. M., & Bednar, J. S. (2010). Pathways for positive identity construction at work: Four types of positive identity and the building of social resources. Academy of Management Review, 35(2), 265-293.
- Fiske, S. T. (2018). Social beings: Core motives in social psychology. John Wiley & Sons.
- Haslam, S. A., & Ellemers, N. (2011). Identity processes in organizations. In S. J. Schwartz, K. Luyckx, & V. L. Vignoles (Eds.), Handbook of identity theory and research (715-744). Springer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7988-9_30
- Heldal, F., Kongsvik, T., & Håland, E. (2019). Advancing the status of nursing: reconstructing professional nursing identity through patient safety work. BMC Health Services Research, 19(1), 418. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913‐019‐4222‐y
- Hogg, M. A. (2016). Social identity theory. En S. McKeown, R. Haji, & N. Ferguson (Eds.), Understanding peace and conflict through social identity theory. Contemporary global perspectives (pp. 3-17). Springer International Publishing.
- Ibarra, H. (1999). Provisional selves: Experimenting with image and identity in professional adaptation. Administrative science quarterly, 44(4), 764-791. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667055
- Ilgen, D. R., & Hollenbeck, J. R. (1991). The structure of work: Job design and roles. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 165–207). Consulting Psychologists Press.
- Jenkins, R. (2014). Social identity. Routledge.
- Leary, M. R. (1999). The social and psychological importance of self-esteem. In R. M. Kowalski & M. R. Leary (Eds.), The social psychology of emotional and behavioral problems: Interfaces of social and clinical psychology (pp. 197–221). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10320-007
- Lisbona Bañuelos, A., Morales Domínguez, J. F., & Palací Descals, F. J. (2006). Identidad y compromiso en equipos de intervención en emergencias. Psicothema, 18, 407-412. https://www.psicothema.com/pdf/3230.pdf
- Lyneham, J., & Levett‐Jones, T. (2016). Insights into registered nurses’ professional values through the eyes of graduating students. Nurse Education in Practice, 17, 86‐90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2015.11.002
- Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of organizational Behavior, 13(2), 103-123. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030130202
- Miró‐Boner, M., Bover‐Bover, A., Moreno‐Mulet, C., Miró‐Bonet, R., & Zaforteza‐Lallemand, C. (2013). Genealogy as a critical toolbox: deconstructing the professional identity of nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 70(4), 768‐776. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12236
- Porck, J. P., Van Knippenberg, D., Tarakci, M., Ateş, N. Y., Groenen, P. J., & De Haas, M. (2020). Do group and organizational identification help or hurt intergroup strategic consensus? Journal of Management, 46(2), 234-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063187884340
- Pratt, M. G. (2016). Hybrid and multiple organizational identities. In M. G. Pratt, M. Schultz, B. E. Ashforth, & D. Ravasi (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of organizational identity (pp. 106-120). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199689576.013.28
- Pratt, M. G., Rockmann, K. W., & Kaufmann, J. B. (2006). Constructing professional identity: The role of work and identity learning cycles in the customization of identity among medical residents. Academy of Management Journal, 49(2), 235-262. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.20786060
- Reb, J., & Connolly, T. (2007). Possession, feelings of ownership and the endowment effect. Judgment and Decision making, 2(2), 107-114. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500000085
- Schlenker, B. R., Britt, T. W., Pennington, J., Murphy, R., & Doherty, K. (1994). The triangle model of responsibility. Psychological Review, 101(4), 632–652. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.4.632
- Schneider, B., Smith, D. B., & Goldstein, H. W. (2000). Attraction–Selection–Attrition: Toward a person–environment psychology of organizations. In W. B. Walsh, K. H. Craik, R. H. Price (Eds.), Person-environment psychology (pp. 61-85). Psychology Press.
- Siebert, D. C., & Siebert, C.F. (2005). The caregiver role identity scale: A validation study. Research on Social Work Practice, 15(3), 204-212. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731504272779
- Tajfel, H., & Wilkes, A. L. (1963). Classification and quantitative judgement. British journal of psychology, 54(2), 101-114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1963.tb00865.x
- Taormina, R. J. (2004). Convergent validation of two measures of organizational socialization. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 15(1), 76-94. https://doi.org/10.1080/0958519032000157357
- Van Knippenberg, D., & Van Schie, E. C. M. (2000). Foci and correlates of organizational identification. Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 73(2), 137-147. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317900166949
- Vignoles, V. L., Regalia, C., Manzi, C., Golledge, J., & Scabini, E. (2006). Beyond self-esteem: influence of multiple motives on identity construction. Journal of personality and social psychology, 90(2), 308-333. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.2.308
- Willetts, G., & Clarke, D. (2014). Constructing nurses’ professional identity through social identity theory. International journal of nursing practice, 20(2), 164-169. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.12108