No 76 (2026): Número en curso
Artículos

Dennett, Gould y la polémica sobre el adaptacionismo cuatro décadas después

PDF (espagnol)
  • Rodrigo Sebastián Braicovich
Rodrigo Sebastián Braicovich
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2785-7293 (non authentifié) Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas image/svg+xml

Publiée 2026-06-14

Comment citer

Braicovich, R. S. (2026). Dennett, Gould y la polémica sobre el adaptacionismo cuatro décadas después. Tópicos. Revista De Filosofía, 76, 187-218. https://doi.org/10.21555/top.v760.3248

Téléchargements

Les données de téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponibles.

(c) Copyright Tópicos. Revista de Filosofía 2026

Creative Commons License

Ce travail est disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International.

Résumé

El objetivo de este artículo es reconstruir de forma general los acuerdos y divergencias entre Daniel Dennett y Stephen Jay Gould subyacentes a la polémica que mantuvieron durante el último cuarto del siglo pasado. Muestro que en los cuestionamientos teóricos y metodológicos iniciales de Gould al adaptacionismo radical se encuentran ya esbozadas las razones que condujeron a la crisis tanto de la sociobiología como de la Psicología Evolucionista, y que la incapacidad de Dennett de comprender las motivaciones de los ataques de Gould al adaptacionismo radical se desprende de su decisión de abordar la polémica en torno a las credenciales epistemológicas de la Psicología Evolucionista desde una perspectiva exclusivamente teorética.

Mots-clés

  • evolución,
  • adaptacionismo,
  • naturaleza humana,
  • psicología evolucionista,
  • Daniel Dennett,
  • Stephen Jay Gould,
  • sociobiología,
  • polémica epistemológica,
  • cuestionamientos metodológicos,
  • filosofía de la biología
    • ...Plus
    Moins
PDF (espagnol)

Références

  1. Apicella, C., Norenzayan, A. y Henrich, J. (2020). Beyond WEIRD: A Review of the Last Decade and a Look Ahead to the Global Laboratory of the Future. Evolution and Human Behavior, 41(5), 319-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2020.07.015
  2. Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L. y Tooby, J. (1992). The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. Oxford University Press.
  3. Barreiro, L. B., Laval, G., Quach, H., Patin, E. y Quintana-Murci, L. (2008). Natural Selection Has Driven Population Differentiation in Modern Humans. Nature Genetics, 40(3), 340-345. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.78
  4. Bolhuis, J. J., Brown, G. R., Richardson, R. C. y Laland, K. N. (2011). Darwin in Mind: New Opportunities for Evolutionary Psychology. PLOS Biology, 9(7), e1001109. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001109
  5. Buller, D. J. (2005). Adapting Minds: Evolutionary Psychology and the Persistent Quest for Human Nature. MIT Press.
  6. Buller, D. J. (2009). Four Fallacies of Pop Evolutionary Psychology. Scientific American, 300(1), 74-81. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0109-74
  7. Buller, D. J. y Hardcastle, V. G. (2000). Evolutionary Psychology, Meet Developmental Neurobiology: Against Promiscuous Modularity. Brain and Mind, 1, 307-325. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011573226794
  8. Buss, D. (1999). Evolutionary Psychology: The New Science of the Mind. Allyn and Bacon.
  9. Buss, D. (2006). The Murderer Next Door: Why the Mind Is Designed to Kill. Penguin Books.
  10. Buss, D., Haselton, M. G., Shackelford, T. K., Bleske, A. L. y Wakefield, J. C. (1998). Adaptations, Exaptations, and Spandrels. American Psychologist, 53(5), 533-548. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.53.5.533
  11. Caponi, G. (2011). La segunda agenda darwiniana: Contribucion preliminar a una historia del programa adaptacionista. Centro de Estudios Filosóficos, Politicos y Sociales Vicente Lombardo Toledano.
  12. Carruthers, P. (2006). The Architecture of the Mind: Massive Modularity and the Flexibility of Thought. Clarendon Press.
  13. Cloud, J. M., Stone, A. M. y McCarthy, J. D. (2023). No Time to “Waist:” Low Waist-to-Hip Ratios Pop out in Visual Search. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 17(3), 345-356. https://doi.org/10.1037/ebs0000308
  14. Cosmides, L. (1989). The Logic of Social Exchange: Has Natural Selection Shaped How Humans Reason? Studies with the Wason Selection Task. Cognition, 31(3), 187-276.
  15. Darwin, C. (2008). The Origin of Species. Oxford University Press.
  16. Dawkins, R. (1982). The Extended Phenotype: The Long Reach of the Gene. Oxford University Press.
  17. Dennett, D. C. (1983). Intentional Systems in Cognitive Ethology: The “Panglossian Paradigm” Defended. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6(3), 343-355. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00016393
  18. Dennett, D. C. (1996a). Darwin’s Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meaning of Life. Touchstone.
  19. Dennett, D. C. (1996b). Kinds of Minds: Towards an Understanding of Consciousness. Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
  20. Dennett, D. C. (1997, 14 de agosto). ‘Darwinian Fundamentalism’: An Exchange. The New York Review of Books, 44(13). https://www.nybooks.com/articles/1997/08/14/darwinian-fundamentalism-an-exchange/
  21. Dennett, D. C. (2003). The Mythical Threat of Genetic Determinism. Chronicle of Higher Education, 49(12), B7-B9.
  22. Dennett, D. C. (2004). Commentary on John Dupré’s “Human Nature and the Limits of Science”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 69(2), 473-483.
  23. Dennett, D. C. (2017). From Bacteria to Bach and Back: The Evolution of Minds. Norton.
  24. Dennett, D. C. (2023). I’ve Been Thinking. Norton & Co.
  25. Eliasmith, C. (2013). How to Build a Brain: A Neural Architecture for Biological Cognition. Oxford University Press.
  26. Gonsalves, B. D. y Cohen, N. J. (2010). Brain Imaging, Cognitive Processes, and Brain Networks. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(6), 744-752. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610388776
  27. Gould, S. J. (1997, 26 de junio). Evolution: The Pleasures of Pluralism. The New York Review of Books, 44(11). https://www.nybooks.com/articles/1997/06/26/evolution-the-pleasures-of-pluralism/
  28. Gould, S. J. (2002). The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. Harvard University Press.
  29. Gould, S. J. (2019). Sociobiology and the Theory of Natural Selection. En G. W. Barlow y J. Silverberg (eds.), Sociobiology: Beyond Nature/Nurture? (pp. 257-269). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429306587-10
  30. Gould, S. J. y Lewontin, R. C. (1979). The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences, 205(1161), 581-598. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1979.0086
  31. Gray, R. D., Heaney, M. y Fairhall, S. (2003). Evolutionary Psychology and the Challenge of Adaptive Expansion. En K. Sterelny y J. Fitness (eds.), From Mating to Mentality: Evaluating Evolutionary Psychology (pp. 247-268). Psychology Press.
  32. Hawks, J., Wang, E. T., Cochran, G. M., Harpending, H. C. y Moyzis, R. K. (2007). Recent Acceleration of Human Adaptive Evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(52), 20753-20758. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0707650104
  33. Hurlbert, A. C. y Ling, Y. (2007). Biological Components of Sex Differences in Color Preference. Current Biology, 17(16), R623-R625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.022
  34. Kaskan, P. M., Franco, E. C. S., Yamada, E. S., de Lima Silveira, L. C., Darlington, R. B. y Finlay, B. L. (2005). Peripheral Variability and Central Constancy in Mammalian Visual System Evolution. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 272(1558), 91-100. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2004.2925
  35. Kitcher, P. (1985). Vaulting Ambition: Sociobiology and the Quest for Human Nature. MIT Press.
  36. Krasnow, M. M., Truxaw, D., Gaulin, S. J. C., New, J., Ozono, H., Uono, S., Ueno, T. y Minemoto, K. (2011). Cognitive Adaptations for Gathering-Related Navigation in Humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.07.003
  37. Lao, O., de Gruijter, J. M., van Duijn, K., Navarro, A. y Kayser, M. (2007). Signatures of Positive Selection in Genes Associated with Human Skin Pigmentation as Revealed from Analyses of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms. Annals of Human Genetics, 71(3), 354-369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1809.2006.00341.x
  38. Lewontin, R. C. (1979). Sociobiology as an Adaptationist Program. Behavioral Science, 24(1), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830240103
  39. Lindquist, K. A. y Barrett, L. F. (2012). A Functional Architecture of the Human Brain: Emerging Insights from the Science of Emotion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(11), 533-540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.09.005
  40. Lloyd, E. A. (1999). Evolutionary Psychology: The Burdens of Proof. Biology and Philosophy, 14(2), 211-233. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1006638501739
  41. McKinnon, S. (2012). Genética neoliberal. Mitos y moralejas de la psicología evolucionista. M. Lamas (trad.). Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  42. Meneganzin, A., Ramsey, G. y DiFrisco, J. (2024). What Is a Trait? Lessons from the Human Chin. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution, 342(2), 65-75. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.b.23249
  43. Nielsen, R., Bustamante, C., Clark, A. G., Glanowski, S., Sackton, T. B., Hubisz, M. J., Fledel-Alon, A., Tanenbaum, D. M., Civello, D., White, T. J., Sninsky, J., Adams, M. D. y Cargill, M. (2005). A Scan for Positively Selected Genes in the Genomes of Humans and Chimpanzees. PLoS Biology, 3(6), e170. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0030170
  44. Oosterwijk, S., Lindquist, K., Anderson, E., Dautoff, R., Moriguchi, Y. y Barrett, L. F. (2012). States of Mind: Emotions, Body Feelings, and Thoughts Share Distributed Neural Networks. NeuroImage, 62, 2110-2128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.07 9
  45. Palecek, M. (2017). Modularity of Mind: Is It Time to Abandon This Ship? Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 47(2), 132-144. https://doi.org/10/gm5rzb
  46. Pazhoohi, F., Afhami, R., Chegeni, R., Dubrov, D., Gałasińska, K., Garza, R., Moharrampour, N. G., Grigoryev, D., Kowal, M., Pallesen, S. y Pfuhl, G. (2024). Cross-Cultural Preferences for Women’s Waist to Hip Ratio and Men’s Shoulder to Hip Ratio: Data From Iran, Norway, Poland, and Russia. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 10(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-024-00232-7
  47. Pessoa, L. (2008). On the Relationship Between Emotion and Cognition. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 9, 148-158. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2317
  48. Peters, B. M. (2013). Evolutionary Psychology: Neglecting Neurobiology in Defining the Mind. Theory & Psychology, 23(3), 305-322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354313480269
  49. Pickrell, J. K., Coop, G., Novembre, J., Kudaravalli, S., Li, J. Z., Absher, D., Srinivasan, B. S., Barsh, G. S., Myers, R. M., Feldman, M. W. y Pritchard, J. K. (2009). Signals of Recent Positive Selection in a Worldwide Sample of Human Populations. Genome Research, 19(5), 826-837. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.087577.108
  50. Pigliucci, M. y Kaplan, J. M. (2000). The Fall and Rise of Dr Pangloss: Adaptationism and the Spandrels Paper 20 Years Later. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 15(2), 66-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01762-0
  51. Pinker, S. (1999). How the Mind Works. Norton.
  52. Pinker, S. (2018). Los ángeles que llevamos dentro. El declive de la violencia y sus implicaciones. J. Soler Chic (trad.). Paidós.
  53. Pollet, T. V. y Saxton, T. K. (2019). How Diverse Are the Samples Used in the Journals ‘Evolution & Human Behavior’ and ‘Evolutionary Psychology’? Evolutionary Psychological Science, 5(3), 357-368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-019-00192-2
  54. Prinz, J. J. (2006). Is the Mind Really Modular? En R. Stainton (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Cognitive Science (pp. 22-36). Blackwell.
  55. Resnik, D. B. (1996). Adaptationism: Hypothesis or Heuristic? Biology and Philosophy, 12(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017936706537
  56. Reznick, D. N., Shaw, F. H., Rodd, F. H. y Shaw, R. G. (1997). Evaluation of the Rate of Evolution in Natural Populations of Guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Science, 275(5308), 1934-1937. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.275.5308.1934
  57. Rose, S. P. R. (2000). Escaping Evolutionary Psychology. En H. Rose (ed.), Alas, Poor Darwin: Arguments against Evolutionary Psychology (pp. 272-291). Vintage.
  58. Rosen, D. E. (1982). Teleostean Interrelationships, Morphological Function and Evolutionary Inference. American Zoologist, 22(2), 261-273. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/22.2.261
  59. Saad, G. (2007). Suicide Triggers as Sex-Specific Threats in Domains of Evolutionary Import: Negative Correlation Between Global Male-To-Female Suicide Ratios and Average per Capita Gross National Income. Medical Hypotheses, 68(3), 692-696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2006.08.012
  60. Sahlins, M. (1973). The Use and Abuse of Biology: An Anthropological Critique of Sociobiology. University of Michigan Press.
  61. Simonson, T. S., Yang, Y., Huff, C. D., Yun, H., Qin, G., Witherspoon, D. J., Bai, Z., Lorenzo, F. R., Xing, J., Jorde, L. B., Prchal, J. T. y Ge, R. (2010). Genetic Evidence for High-Altitude Adaptation in Tibet. Science, 329(5987), 72-75. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1189406
  62. Singh, D. (1993). Body Shape and Women’s Attractiveness. Human Nature, 4(3), 297-321. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692203
  63. Singh, D. y Young, R. K. (1995). Body Weight, Waist-To-Hip Ratio, Breasts, and Hips: Role in Judgments of Female Attractiveness and Desirability for Relationships. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16(6), 483-507. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(95)00074-7
  64. Sterelny, K. (2003). Thought in a Hostile World: The Evolution of Human Cognition. Blackwell.
  65. Sterelny, K. y Griffiths, P. (1999). Sex and Death: An Introduction to Philosophy of Biology. University of Chicago Press.
  66. Tattersall, I. (2001). Evolution, Genes, and Behavior. Zygon, 36(4), 657-666. https://doi.org/10.1111/0591-2385.00389
  67. Thagard, P. y Schröder, T. (2015). Emotions as Semantic Pointers: Constructive Neural Mechanisms. En L. F. Barrett y J. A. Russell (eds.), The Psychological Construction of Emotion (pp. 144-167). The Guilford Press.
  68. Thornhill, R. y Palmer, C. T. (2000). A Natural History of Rape: Biological Bases of Sexual Coercion. MIT Press.
  69. Tishkoff, S. A., Reed, F. A., Ranciaro, A., Voight, B. F., Babbitt, C. C., Silverman, J. S., Powell, K., Mortensen, H. M., Hirbo, J. B., Osman, M., Ibrahim, M., Omar, S. A., Lema, G., Nyambo, T. B., Ghori, J., Bumpstead, S., Pritchard, J. K., Wray, G. A. y Deloukas, P. (2007). Convergent Adaptation of Human Lactase Persistence in Africa and Europe. Nature Genetics, 39(1), 31-40. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1946
  70. Uttal, W. R. (2001). The New Phrenology: The Limits of Localizing Cognitive Processes in the Brain. MIT Press.
  71. Vance, G. S., Zeigler-Hill, V., Vonk, J. y Shackelford, T. K. (2024). Inevitable or Preventable? The Biosocial Theory of Wartime Rape. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 10(2), 135-154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-024-00387-2
  72. Veillard, N. (2017). WEIRD Sampling in Crosscultural Psychology, Should It Not Be Less WEIRD and More Representative? The Overrepresentation of Individuals from Western Educated Industrialized and Democratic Countries as Sample Populations in Cross-Cultural Psychology Research [Tesis de maestría, Universidad de Leiden]. Leiden University Student Repository. https://hdl.handle.net/1887/56361
  73. Williams, G. C. (1996). Adaptation and Natural Selection: A Critique of Some Current Evolutionary Thought. Princeton University Press.
  74. Woodward, J. y Cowie, F. (2003). The Mind Is Not (Just) a System of Modules Shaped (Just) by Natural Selection. En C. R. Hitchcock (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Science (pp. 312-334). Blackwell.