No. 75 (2026): Mayo-agosto
Filosofía en el espacio público

Artificial Intelligence, Superintelligence, and Cognitive Enhancement

Daniel Augusto Duarte Arias Universidad de San Buenaventura, Bogota image/svg+xml

Published 2026-04-01

How to Cite

Duarte Arias, D. A. (2026). Artificial Intelligence, Superintelligence, and Cognitive Enhancement. Tópicos, Revista De Filosofía, 75, 503-540. https://doi.org/10.21555/top.v750.3280

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Abstract

Transhumanism is a philosophical movement that considers the attainment of a higher evolutionary stage possible because of the feasibility of the “singularity.” Some positions consider that this is not possible due to the intrinsic limits of artificial intelligence (AI). I claim that, despite the impossibility of reaching superhuman stages, AI satisfies the criteria of cognitive enhancement (at some restorative level and within limits). This enhancement manifests itself in specific capabilities that result in an increase that transcends human limits but does not lead to a higher evolutionary stage. To defend this, I examine what AI, artificial superintelligence (AIS), and the singularity are; subsequently I  discuss some objections to the possibility of achieving a general artificial intelligence (GAI) drawn from John Searle, Roger Penrose, and Hubert Dreyfus; finally, I argue (by means of a taxonomy) at which levels AI can be said to represent cognitive enhancement.

Keywords

  • artificial intelligence,
  • weak IA,
  • strong IA,
  • cognitive enhancement,
  • singularity,
  • superintelligence,
  • transhumanism,
  • superhuman,
  • qualitative experience,
  • extended mind
  • ...More
    Less

References

  1. Asla, M. (2021). Mental Transference (Mind Up-loading): Metaphysical Controversies around the Preservation of Personal Identity. Forum. Supplement to Acta Philosophica, 3, 169-183. https://doi.org/10.17421/2498-9746-03-09
  2. Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. Oxford University Press.
  3. Bostrom, N. y Sandberg, A. (2009). Cognitive Enhancement: Methods, Ethics, Regulatory Challenges. Science and Engineering Ethics, 15(3), 311-341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-009-9142-5
  4. Chalmers, D. (1995). Facing Up to the Problem of Consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2(3), 200-219.
  5. Chalmers, D. (1996). The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. Oxford University Press.
  6. Chalmers, D. (2010). The Singularity: A Philosophical Analysis. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 17(9-10), 7-65.
  7. Clark, A. y Chalmers, D. (1998). The Extended Mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7-19. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/58.1.7
  8. Coeckelbergh, M. (2021). Ética de la inteligencia artificial. L. Álvarez Canga (trad.). Cátedra.
  9. Diéguez, A. (2016). La singularidad tecnológica y el desafío posthumano. Pasajes: Revista de Pensamiento Contemporáneo, 50, 154-164.
  10. Diéguez, A. (2020). La función ideológica del transhumanismo y algunos de sus presupuestos. Isegoría, 63, 367-386. https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2020.063.05
  11. Diéguez, A. (2021). Cuerpos inadecuados el desafio transhumanista a la filosofia. Herder.
  12. Dobre, C. E. y García Pavón, R. (2024). Singularidad individual versus “singularity”. Una crítica al transhumanismo desde el pensamiento de Søren Kierkegaard. Tópicos, Revista de Filosofía, 69, 389-420. https://doi.org/10.21555/top.v690.2503
  13. Dretske, F. I. (1981). Knowledge & the Flow of Information. MIT Press.
  14. Dreyfus, H. L. (1967). Why Computers Must Have Bodies in Order to Be Intelligent. The Review of Metaphysics, 21(1), 13-32.
  15. Ferry, L. (2018). La revolución transhumanista. A. Martorell (trad.). Alianza.
  16. Good, I. J. (1966). Speculations Concerning the First Ultraintelligent Machine. En F. L. Alt y M. Rubinoff (eds.), Advances in Computers. 6 (pp. 31-88). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2458(08)60418-0
  17. Google DeepMind. (s. f.). Google DeepMind. https://www.deepmind.com/
  18. Google DeepMind. (2022, 5 de octubre). Discovering Novel Algorithms with AlphaTensor. https://www.deepmind.com/blog/discovering-novel-algorithms-with-alphatensor
  19. Google DeepMind. (2023a, 7 de junio). AlphaDev Discovers Faster Sorting Algorithms. https://www.deepmind.com/blog/alphadev-discovers-faster-sorting-algorithms
  20. Google DeepMind. (2023b, 28 de julio). RT-2: New Model Translates Vision and Language into Action. https://www.deepmind.com/blog/rt-2-new-model-translates-vision-and-language-into-action
  21. Google DeepMind. (2023c, 19 de septiembre). A Catalogue of Genetic Mutations to Help Pinpoint the Cause of Diseases. https://www.deepmind.com/blog/alphamissense-catalogue-of-genetic-mutations-to-help-pinpoint-the-cause-of-diseases
  22. Hoffmann, C. H. (2023). The Quest for a Universal Theory of Intelligence: The Mind, the Machine, and Singularity Hypotheses. De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110756166
  23. Jackson, F. (1982). Epiphenomenal Qualia. The Philosophical Quarterly, 32(127), 127-136. https://doi.org/10.2307/2960077
  24. Jackson, F. (1986). What Mary Didn’t Know. The Journal of Philosophy, 83(5), 291-295. https://doi.org/10.2307/2026143
  25. Kurzweil, R. (2005). The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. Viking.
  26. Larson, E. J. (2021). The Myth of Artificial Intelligence: Why Computers Can’t Think the Way We Do. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674259935
  27. McCarthy, J. (1978). History of LISP. ACM SIGPLAN Notices, 13(8), 217-223. https://doi.org/10.1145/960118.808387
  28. Minsky, M. (1988). The society of mind. Simon & Schuster.
  29. Mnih, V., Kavukcuoglu, K., Silver, D., Rusu, A. A., Veness, J., Bellemare, M. G., Graves, A., Riedmiller, M., Fidjeland, A. K., Ostrovski, G., Petersen, S., Beattie, C., Sadik, A., Antonoglou, I., King, H., Kumaran, D., Wierstra, D., Legg, S. y Hassabis, D. (2015). Human-level Control through Deep Reinforcement Learning. Nature, 518(7540), 529-533. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14236
  30. Moravec, H. P. (2000). Robot: Mere Machine to Transcendent Mind. Oxford University Press.
  31. Nagel, T. (1974). What Is It Like to Be a Bat? Philosophical Review, 83(4), 435-450.
  32. Newell, A. y Simon, H. A. (1972). Human Problem Solving. Prentice Hall.
  33. OpenAI. (s. f.). ChatGPT. https://openai.com/chatgpt
  34. Parens, E. (1998). Special Supplement: Is Better Always Good? The Enhancement Project. The Hastings Center Report, 28(1), S1-S17. https://doi.org/10.2307/3527981
  35. Penrose, R. (1995). Beyond the Doubting of a Shadow: A Reply to Commentaries on Shadows of the Mind. PSYCHE: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Consciousness, 2, 1-40.
  36. Preston, J. (2002). Introducción. En M. Bishop y J. Preston (eds.), Views into the Chinese Room: New Essays on Searle and Artificial Intelligence (pp. 1-50). Clarendon Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198250579.003.0001
  37. Rivera-Novoa, Á. (2020). Mente extendida y transhumanismo. ¿Qué tan humana es la mente de un cyborg? En O. M. Donato Rodríguez, D. M. Muñoz González y Á. Rivera Novoa (eds.), Redefinir lo humano en la era técnica: perspectivas filosóficas (pp. 75-89). Universidad Libre. https://repository.unilibre.edu.co/handle/10901/19869
  38. Rivera-Novoa, Á. (2024). La tesis de la mente extendida y el ideal transhumanista de mejoramiento cognitivo. Trilogía. Ciencia Tecnología Sociedad, 16(33), e3142. https://doi.org/10.22430/21457778.3142
  39. Rivera-Novoa, Á. y Duarte Arias, D. A. (2025). Generative Artificial Intelligence and Extended Cognition in Science Learning Contexts. Science & Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-025-00660-1
  40. Rowlands, M. (2010). The New Science of the Mind: From Extended Mind to Embodied Phenomenology. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262014557.001.0001
  41. Russell, S. J. y Norvig, P. (2021). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Pearson.
  42. Sandberg, A. (2011). Cognition Enhancement: Upgrading the Brain. En J. Savulescu, R. ter Meulen y G. Kahane (eds.), Enhancing Human Capacities (pp. 71-91). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444393552.ch5
  43. Sarne, D. y Grosz, B. J. (2007). Sharing Experiences to Learn User Characteristics in Dynamic Environments with Sparse Data. En E. H. Durfee, M. Yokoo, M. N. Huhns y O. Shehory (eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (pp. 202-209). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/1329125.1329176
  44. Searle, J. R. (1980). Minds, Brains, and Programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(3), 417-424. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005756
  45. Sincrolab. (s. f.). Sincrolab. Recuperación cognitiva y neuropsicología digital. https://sincrolab.es/
  46. Turing, A. M. (1950). Computing Machinery and Intelligence. Mind, 59(236), 433-460. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LIX.236.433
  47. Vinge, V. (1993). The Coming Technological Singularity: How to Survive in the Post-Human Era. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:5750614