No. 67 (2023): Septiembre-diciembre
Reseñas críticas

Soames, S. (2019). El surgimiento de la filosofía analítica. F. M. Wong, E. V. Chigne, J. C. Gamboa y P. L. Dammert (trads.). Tecnos-Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. 272 pp.

PDF (Spanish) XML (Spanish)
  • David Rojas Lizama
David Rojas Lizama Universidad de Santiago de Chile

Published 2023-08-01

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Rojas Lizama, D. (2023). Soames, S. (2019). El surgimiento de la filosofía analítica. F. M. Wong, E. V. Chigne, J. C. Gamboa y P. L. Dammert (trads.). Tecnos-Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. 272 pp . Tópicos, Revista De Filosofía, 67, 481-484. https://doi.org/10.21555/top.v670.2754
PDF (Spanish) XML (Spanish)

References

  1. Beaney, M. (2015). Soames on Frege: Provoking Thoughts. Philosophical Studies, 172(6), 1651–1660. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-015-0483-4.
  2. Kremer, M. (2005). [Reseña de Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century, vol. 1: The Dawn of Analysis, y Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century, vol. 2: The Age of Meaning, por S. Soames]. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews. URL: https://ndpr.nd.edu/reviews/book-1-philosophical-analysis-in-the-twentieth-century-vol-1-the-dawn-of-analysis-book-2-philosophical-analysis-in-the-twentieth-century-vol-2-the-age-of-meaning/.
  3. Pigden, C. R. (2015). Scott Soames: The Analytic Tradition in Philosophy, Volume 1: Founding Giants: Princeton University Press. Philosophical Studies, 172(6), 1671–1680. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-015-0485-2.
  4. Pincock, C. (2005). History of Philosophical Analysis [Reseña de Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century, de S. Soames]. Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies, 25(2), 167–171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15173/russell.v25i2.2087.
  5. Pincock, C. (2006). Rejoinder to Soames. Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies, 26(1), 77-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15173/russell.v26i1.2093.
  6. Soames, S. (2003). Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century. Volume 1: The Dawn of Analysis. Princeton University Press.
  7. Soames, S. (2005a). Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century. Volume 2: The Age of Meaning. Princeton University Press.
  8. Soames, S. (2005b). Reply to Pincock’s Review. Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies, 25(2), 172-177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15173/russell.v25i2.2088.
  9. Soames, S. (2006). Reply to Critics of Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century: Christopher Pincock, Thomas Hurka, Michael Kremer, and Paul Horwich. USC Dornsife. Scott Soames. Discussions. URL: https://dornsife.usc.edu/assets/sites/678/docs/Replies/Rep__Philosophical_Ayalysis.pdf.
  10. Soames, S. (2014). The Analytic Tradition in Philosophy. Volume 1: The Founding Giants. Princeton University Press.
  11. Soames, S. (2015). Reply to Critics of The Analytic Tradition in Philosophy. Volume 1: The Founding Giants. Philosophical Studies, 172(6), 1681–1696. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-015-0486-1.
  12. Soames, S. (2018). The Analytic Tradition in Philosophy. Volume 2: A New Vision. Princeton University Press.
  13. Soames, S. (2019). El surgimiento de la filosofía analítica. F. M. Wong, E. V. Chigne, J. C. Gamboa y P. L. Dammert (trads.). Tecnos-Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.

Copyright (c) 2023 David Rojas Lizama

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.