Núm. 67 (2023): Septiembre-diciembre
Reseñas críticas

Soames, S. (2019). El surgimiento de la filosofía analítica. F. M. Wong, E. V. Chigne, J. C. Gamboa y P. L. Dammert (trads.). Tecnos-Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. 272 pp.

PDF XML
  • David Rojas Lizama
David Rojas Lizama
Universidad de Santiago de Chile
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21555/top.v670.2754

Publicado 2023-08-01

Cómo citar

Rojas Lizama, D. (2023). Soames, S. (2019). El surgimiento de la filosofía analítica. F. M. Wong, E. V. Chigne, J. C. Gamboa y P. L. Dammert (trads.). Tecnos-Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. 272 pp . Tópicos, Revista De Filosofía, (67), 481–484. https://doi.org/10.21555/top.v670.2754

Derechos de autor 2023 Tópicos, Revista de Filosofía

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Altmetrics

Citas

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
PDF XML

Citas

  1. Beaney, M. (2015). Soames on Frege: Provoking Thoughts. Philosophical Studies, 172(6), 1651–1660. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-015-0483-4.
  2. Kremer, M. (2005). [Reseña de Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century, vol. 1: The Dawn of Analysis, y Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century, vol. 2: The Age of Meaning, por S. Soames]. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews. URL: https://ndpr.nd.edu/reviews/book-1-philosophical-analysis-in-the-twentieth-century-vol-1-the-dawn-of-analysis-book-2-philosophical-analysis-in-the-twentieth-century-vol-2-the-age-of-meaning/.
  3. Pigden, C. R. (2015). Scott Soames: The Analytic Tradition in Philosophy, Volume 1: Founding Giants: Princeton University Press. Philosophical Studies, 172(6), 1671–1680. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-015-0485-2.
  4. Pincock, C. (2005). History of Philosophical Analysis [Reseña de Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century, de S. Soames]. Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies, 25(2), 167–171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15173/russell.v25i2.2087.
  5. Pincock, C. (2006). Rejoinder to Soames. Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies, 26(1), 77-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15173/russell.v26i1.2093.
  6. Soames, S. (2003). Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century. Volume 1: The Dawn of Analysis. Princeton University Press.
  7. Soames, S. (2005a). Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century. Volume 2: The Age of Meaning. Princeton University Press.
  8. Soames, S. (2005b). Reply to Pincock’s Review. Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies, 25(2), 172-177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15173/russell.v25i2.2088.
  9. Soames, S. (2006). Reply to Critics of Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century: Christopher Pincock, Thomas Hurka, Michael Kremer, and Paul Horwich. USC Dornsife. Scott Soames. Discussions. URL: https://dornsife.usc.edu/assets/sites/678/docs/Replies/Rep__Philosophical_Ayalysis.pdf.
  10. Soames, S. (2014). The Analytic Tradition in Philosophy. Volume 1: The Founding Giants. Princeton University Press.
  11. Soames, S. (2015). Reply to Critics of The Analytic Tradition in Philosophy. Volume 1: The Founding Giants. Philosophical Studies, 172(6), 1681–1696. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-015-0486-1.
  12. Soames, S. (2018). The Analytic Tradition in Philosophy. Volume 2: A New Vision. Princeton University Press.
  13. Soames, S. (2019). El surgimiento de la filosofía analítica. F. M. Wong, E. V. Chigne, J. C. Gamboa y P. L. Dammert (trads.). Tecnos-Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.